>>11446723Dont know what that is off the top of my head but I guess. Alot of times you'll find yourself proving stuff like showing invariance of things under change of bases. Proving that a certain set of orthogonal functions defined over a ring form a complete basis (i.e. coherent states), and proving invariance of expectation values over such an orthogonal decomposition etc etc.
This isn't all though, there are also approximations to prove, and other stuff, but I haven't done physics since undergrad and now am completely invested in improving my computer science skills.
Things like these are inherently math based but provide physical insight on to what can and can't happen in physics.
Honestly I'm not sure if there is much of a difference between advanced quantum and mathematical physics, besides the further abstractions in mathematical physics.
Honestly I suck at math unless physics is involved in it
