/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11433717

14KiB, 245x241, 1554998938023.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 11:51:58 2020 No.11433717 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11433724 >>11433744 >>11434129 >>11434160 >>11434188 >>11435196 >>11435260 >>11436088 >>11436115 >>11436376 >>11436414 >>11436437 >>11437070

0=1, 1=0, 2=0, 3=0, 4=1, 5=0, 6=1, 7=0, 8=2, 9=1, 10=1, 11=?

Can you solve it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 11:58:04 No.11433724 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433717
11

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 12:00:33 No.11433731 Report

Quoted By: >>11433743 >>11434203 >>11434413 >>11435316 >>11436088

0
Amount of enclosed spaces in the number

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 12:01:19 No.11433733 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 12:09:49 No.11433743 Report

Quoted By: >>11434203 >>11436088

>>11433731
This. It's one of those questions where people say kindergarteners solve this way better than adults.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 12:09:56 No.11433744 Report

Quoted By: >>11435160

>>11433717
>hurr durr I misuse the equals sign for something other than equals

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 16:23:43 No.11434129 Report

Quoted By: >>11434136 >>11434163 >>11434208 >>11434780 >>11434900 >>11435316

>>11433717
number of prime factors minus one?

2 0
3 0
4 1
5 0
6 1
7 0
8 2
9 1
10 1
11 0
12 2
13 0
14 1
15 1
16 3
17 0
18 2
19 0
20 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 16:26:25 No.11434136 Report

Quoted By:

>>11434129
I think you're right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 16:33:53 No.11434160 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433717
0

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 16:35:20 No.11434163 Report

Quoted By:

>>11434129
It has definitely something to do with primes since 2,3,5,7 are zero and others are non zero.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 16:46:34 No.11434188 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433717
NUMBER OF CIRCLES IN NUMBEEEER XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Sage

Sage Mon 02 Mar 2020 16:50:39 No.11434203 Report

Quoted By: >>11434208 >>11434403 >>11434897 >>11437067

>>11433731
>>11433743
Not an equivalence relation you troglodytes. Come back when you are over 18.

Sage

Sage Mon 02 Mar 2020 16:51:52 No.11434208 Report

Quoted By:

>>11434129
See
>>11434203

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 18:03:03 No.11434403 Report

Quoted By:

>>11434203
Nobody said it was, brainlet.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 18:07:09 No.11434413 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433731
I was going to say the number of times you self intersect the line as you write the number

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 20:45:32 No.11434780 Report

Quoted By:

>>11434129
>0 has 2 prime factors

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 21:39:13 No.11434897 Report

Quoted By: >>11436343 >>11436434

>>11434203
It IS an equivalence relation you absolute retard. Come back when you know the actual meaning of the words you use.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 21:41:37 No.11434900 Report

Quoted By: >>11434928

>>11434129
You can't just ignore the 0 and 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 22:03:16 No.11434928 Report

Quoted By: >>11434988 >>11434992

>>11434900
I don't think you know what induction is.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 22:31:36 No.11434988 Report

Quoted By:

>>11434928
I just think you're a retard. It's true for base case 0 self intersects one time. Suppose for n it is true. Consider n + 1. Can it possibly follow from case n that it is true for n? If n ends in 0 -8 it is trivially true for n+1 because op showed the values for 1-9. If n is 9 there is more. Also this isn't so much mathematical induction as it is pattern recognition.

You dont use induction for iq pattern tests do you you retard tier brainlet? No wonder you test in the double digits

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 22:33:20 No.11434992 Report

Quoted By: >>11435117

>>11434928
Induction has a base case which is 0 for this problem. Do you enjoy being either a retard or a troll

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 23:16:29 No.11435117 Report

Quoted By: >>11435226

>>11434992
Base case is 2. 1 and 0 are identities.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 23:23:42 No.11435134 Report

Quoted By:

welcome to facebook
up you can see a dumb """mathematics""" problem
at your left a boomer comic
down a meme from 2011 that has so much jpeg compression that you can barely read the text on it

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 23:36:31 No.11435160 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433744
based

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Mar 2020 23:54:47 No.11435196 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433717
The solution is: You are an enormous faggot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 00:05:02 No.11435226 Report

Quoted By:

>>11435117
Riiiiiiiiiiight.......... you are proof that an average iq of 100 is generous

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 00:19:31 No.11435260 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433717
0, you're counting the number of closed loops in the number

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 00:44:46 No.11435316 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433731
>>11434129
is there a secret genius in the shapes of the numerals then?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 09:20:24 No.11436088 Report

Quoted By: >>11436343

>>11433717
>>11433731
>>11433743

>when you don't know sets but want to seem smart
finish high school first, kiddies.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 09:41:50 No.11436115 Report

Quoted By: >>11436132

>>11433717
Took me about 3 minutes.
In case it hasn't already been said, the answer is:

>11=0, 12=0, 13=0, 14=1, 15=0, 16=1 ... 48=3, etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 09:52:38 No.11436132 Report

Quoted By: >>11436390

>>11436115
How big is you're IQ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 12:39:28 No.11436343 Report

Quoted By:

>>11436088
See
>>11434897
etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 12:56:02 No.11436376 Report

Quoted By: >>11436414

>>11433717
11=0
because 11 is a prime number

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 13:06:46 No.11436390 Report

Quoted By:

>>11436132
>How big is you're IQ?
*your

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 13:23:00 No.11436414 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433717
>>11436376
it's like
-0=0? yes. 1
-2=2? no. 0
-2*-5=10? yes. 1
-2*-2*-2=8? no
-2*-2*2=8? yes. 2
-2*-2*-2*-3*-3*-3=216? yes. 3
each prime factor is considered on its own and you count, considering the maximum amount of negative numbers that you can use to get that result.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 13:32:31 No.11436434 Report

Quoted By:

>>11434897
>4=1
>1=4
>1 has 5 prime factors
Kill yourself retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 13:33:39 No.11436437 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433717
0=1 : false, thus all the following is trascurable. There are no solutions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 17:58:28 No.11437067 Report

Quoted By:

>>11434203
the symbol "=" obviously doesn't stand for equality in this problem

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 Mar 2020 18:00:07 No.11437070 Report

Quoted By:

>>11433717
False, False, False, False, False, False, False, False, False, False, False, 11
What do I win?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches