>>11432907>What is the best strategies in trading that you can easily think ofInsider trading
>What returns are realistic for a 99.9 percentile fundRealistic by what standard? If it's realistic and honest, the strategy could be shared. Of course, it's not, under the guise of protecting their IP.
Just as there is a range of performance in funds, there is also a range of honesty. You, someone who is pretending to know what you are talking about, obviously know there have always been and always will be funds that violate SEC law (or other law, like tax law, which Ren Tech was caught violating to the tune of millions) to varying degrees. Historically, many funds or investments in the top percentile have been a range between questionable ethics to outright scams.
If Ren Tech isn't raising red flags for you, you're a fucking moron and don't know anything about trading.
>nooo they are the real deal they use physicists instead of traders because they fucking love science and they are proving science nerds can beat the Wall Street jocks!We see this play out with all cheating really, baseball, cycling, etc. Obviously athletes will fall across a spectrum of performance, just like funds. There's a point where it stops adding up though, like when you look at the Tour de France times up Col de Tourmalet for instance. All of a sudden tour cyclists start putting out 15% more watts/kg. People inevitably get caught, let's say Pantani, who was climbing the same speed as Armstrong, yet was shown to be on enough doping agents to kill a horse. People, like you, STILL believed Armstrong wasn't cheating, while it was attributed to stupid magic training and his special cadence. It just keeps happening over and over, Froome starts putting out those w/kg numbers, and people attribute it to other special magic training. Same formula every time, ponzi scheme, sports cheater, etc., people always eat it up.
