>>11427204who are you quoting
That sounds exactly like the argument that some crackpot used to show Einstein's relativity is actually monopoly capitalism
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_Any_Effective_Refutation_of_Einsteins_Theories_of_Relativity_Possible>Any ambitious and aspiring scientist has to master the brain-wrecking mathematics and practice it in endless and useless mathematical deductions (shut-up and calculate!) like the early Greeks or like medieval scholasticism; pre-occupying them with esoteric ideas and mysticism that have no relevance to reality or the practical needs of the society. Enormous human, material and technological resources and billions of dollars of taxpayer’s money are spent to “prove” these useless esoteric theories>Turning this forum into a technical/mathematical debate will divert attention from its main focus and will provide an escape valve for the apologists of the theories of relativity.Basically he complains a lot about usage of modern mathematics (even something as basic as Tensors), and emphatically denies that there is any evidence or the probability that these beautiful maths are actually true, because for every evidence presented, he and other crackpots can argue it supports the opposing theories. Which is not difficult, considering
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duhem%E2%80%93Quine_thesisAnd the thing is, due to the lack of understanding of the math, these guys never see where they went wrong, only when you translate them into the language of modern mathematics you will see how their ideas are incoherent gibberish.
