>>11436202>You can find many informationLike I said, none of this is based on empirical evidence. Just on personal accounts of people making things up that sound plausible but aren't grounded in science. I'm happy to change my mind if you show me papers that demonstrate that I'm wrong, but so far you haven't. Why do you think it is called a learning *disability* in the first place?
>normally the brain is so lazy The brain is not 'lazy'. The brain has limited computational resources, and performing a task with less resources is adaptive in the long run.
>dyslexics hear the voice in far more detailThis simply isn't true. Dyslexics do differ in reading strategy, and rely on the correspondence between total word and phoneme instead of individual letters, but your unsupported extrapolation is that this coincides with 'more detail' in internal vocalization of the phoneme. There is no way to even test this empirically. It's nonsensical.
