/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11423552

60KiB, 1067x658, bayes.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 03:02:00 2020 No.11423552 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11423576 >>11423878 >>11423921 >>11424298 >>11425308

ITT: Incorrect theorems

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 03:10:18 No.11423576 Report

Quoted By: >>11424146

>>11423552

prove it cocksucker

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO math-is-hard.jpg, 14KiB, 500x281

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 06:06:46 No.11423878 Report

Quoted By: >>11423898

>>11423552
>when you think your burgerland math education makes you competent in bayesian statistics

Elder NPC

Elder NPC Fri 28 Feb 2020 06:19:45 No.11423898 Report

Quoted By:

>>11423878
That fucking pic got me good. That look of disgust is like fucking gold.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 06:40:28 No.11423921 Report

Quoted By: >>11425307

>>11423552
Is there more to this bait than "Bayes' Theorem wrong"? Weak effort so far

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 09:56:09 No.11424145 Report

Quoted By:

It's actually so intuitive that I doubt Bayes was the first to come up with it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 09:57:07 No.11424146 Report

Quoted By:

>>11423576
kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 12:01:25 No.11424298 Report

Quoted By: >>11425289 >>11425302

>>11423552
A "theorem" of Jan-Erik Roos in 1961 stated that in an [AB4*] abelian category, lim1 vanishes on Mittag-Leffler sequences. This "theorem" was used by many people since then, but it was disproved by counterexample in 2002 by Amnon Neeman.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 14:55:21 No.11424572 Report

Quoted By:

The Baye's theorem proof is just adding two areas together. Literally no more complicated than 1 + 1 = 2.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 19:42:27 No.11425289 Report

Quoted By:

>>11424298

Mathematicians are incompetent confirmed

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 19:46:37 No.11425302 Report

Quoted By:

>>11424298
>This "theorem" was used by many people
Name four.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 19:48:20 No.11425307 Report

Quoted By:

>>11423921
Still garnered him 4 (you)s

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 19:48:28 No.11425308 Report

Quoted By: >>11425472

>>11423552
So you disagree that P(A and B) = P(A|B) P(B) = P(B|A) P(A)?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 20:36:37 No.11425472 Report

Quoted By: >>11425482

>>11425308
Retards disagree with what they don't understand.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 20:40:20 No.11425482 Report

Quoted By: >>11425499 >>11425506

>>11425472
that’s incorrect. I disagree with the climate consensus and there’s people much more retarded than me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 20:45:04 No.11425499 Report

Quoted By:

>>11425482
>Retards disagree with what they don't understand.
>that’s incorrect. I disagree with the climate consensus and there’s people much more retarded than me.
Nice non-sequitur, retard. You don't understand the consensus. And you apparently can't even read a simple sentence.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 20:46:47 No.11425506 Report

Quoted By: >>11425511

>>11425482
It's fallacious to conclude that you aren't retarded just because there are people more retarded than you

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 20:47:35 No.11425511 Report

Quoted By: >>11425519

>>11425506
I don't see how you would come to such absurd conclusion

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Feb 2020 20:49:13 No.11425519 Report

Quoted By:

>>11425511
why am I bumping this retarded thread? sage

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches