/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11413864

32KiB, 1064x456, IQ TEST 2 first one was 80.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 17:16:45 2020 No.11413864 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11414098 >>11414201 >>11414822 >>11416123 >>11416503 >>11418127 >>11418530 >>11421129

Hey /sci/ is this test valid
https://stanfordbinettest.com/
feel free to take the test and post results
I took it yesterday and got an 80, 10th percentile but I did better today

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 17:32:04 No.11413894 Report

Quoted By: >>11413906

23rd, what a scam

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 17:36:01 No.11413906 Report

Quoted By:

>>11413894
where did you get tested?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 17:52:38 No.11413944 Report

Quoted By: >>11414088 >>11414130 >>11414276 >>11415900 >>11415920 >>11418115 >>11418469

No.

Ranking online IQ tests:
JCTI-Removed and now available only in archived version which isn't as accurate and tend to underestimate results.
https://www.free-iq-test.net/
http://www.mensa.fi/wordpress/?page_id=27
http://test.mensa.no/
https://mensa.dk/iqtest/

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 18:14:28 No.11414018 Report

Quoted By:

86th, probably fake & gay. Ive done way too many drugs to hit that.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO rawIQ.png, 29KiB, 714x208

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 18:35:57 No.11414088 Report

Quoted By: >>11414619 >>11414822

>>11413944
>https://www.free-iq-test.net/
120 on three hours sleep isn't too bad, though the test was boring af.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 8thpercentile.png, 148KiB, 2404x922

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 18:37:39 No.11414098 Report

Quoted By: >>11421840

>>11413864
Fucked up real bad... scrambled letters are the bane of my life. Kill me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 18:51:12 No.11414130 Report

Quoted By: >>11414187 >>11414303 >>11415017

>>11413944
What makes them more accurate?

Also has anyone here actually gotten tested by a psychologist. Most people online claim to have scores above 120 despite how rare that should be, I'm included in that. But something has to be wrong with the test right. I'll take these if your sure they're a little better though.

I guess Im also a bit biased because It would be a little comforting to know Im somewhere around 80.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 18:52:07 No.11414134 Report

Quoted By:

Where are all the /sci/ 160+IQ chads now that a real intelligence test is posted?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:04:12 No.11414187 Report

Quoted By:

>>11414130
You forget to account for the fact that people who are likely to take the test online are generally not from the general populace but a specialized subset.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:06:57 No.11414201 Report

Quoted By: >>11414217

>>11413864
Literally the worst test ever. If you take the time to actually read the questions instead of randomly answering, you are heavily penalized. Any test where randomly answering gives better results than actually reading (not even thinking, just reading) is obvious bullshit (it is extremely skewed toward whether or not you have learned speed-reading, which is not a skill even high-IQ individuals who haven't explicitly trained for it actually acquire).

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:09:31 No.11414217 Report

Quoted By: >>11414221 >>11414275

>>11414201
Intellect is not only about right answer. It is also about speed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:10:51 No.11414221 Report

Quoted By: >>11414258

>>11414217
That's why I explicitly differentiated between quick thinking and quick reading, and between the edge condition 'random answering' and actually reading (as opposed to even 'random answering' vs actually thinking which should be the actual edge condition).

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:27:55 No.11414258 Report

Quoted By: >>11414285

>>11414221
Fair enough.

I am a bit puzzled, why here on 4chan people are so often obsess with I.Q. It is just one of metrics, which not always translates in real world problem solving. Have met some quite high IQ people (really good in mathematics), who are problematic with day-to-day problem solutions.

There is more like, very successful people have high IQ, but not all high IQ people are successful.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:31:59 No.11414275 Report

Quoted By:

>>11414217
Most questions had an obvious way to get the answer and a shorter way. By measuring time you can measure how efficiently the problems are being solved. It's not perfect, but its the best we have without a proctor.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20200224-162438.png, 71KiB, 720x1280

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:32:15 No.11414276 Report

Quoted By: >>11414301 >>11416077

>>11413944
I think this is bs as I left blank half of the answers on my first try and got 114
Also my history of iq tests done online ranged from 107 (lowest score I've scored) to 115 (highest)
I'd assume that on a "real" IQ test I'd be able to score above 100 but not too far from 100
IQ tests are a meme and if I'm pretty sure that if I took another one that differed in methodology I might even score below 100

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:35:35 No.11414285 Report

Quoted By: >>11414331

>>11414258
Very successful people don't even have high IQ, they have mildling IQ. High IQ people are unsuccessful because they're bottleneck by forward thinking and low IQ people are bottlenecked by their low IQ.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:40:52 No.11414301 Report

Quoted By:

>>11414276
For some random online IQ test got 142 at first attempt. Could be the same as here. And come to similar conclusions. Although frequently meeting some dumb people, i also have met some really, really smart and gifted, and i know that i am far beyond them. More realistic result would be 95...105.

From other hand, there are quite a lot of alcoholics out there, and their IQ are mostly deteriorating. May be they, are effectively dragging this average IQ down.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:41:37 No.11414303 Report

Quoted By:

>>11414130
>Most people online claim to have scores above 120
Online tests are a joke, and in fact because of online availability of practice questions, even legitimate IQ tests are being gamed.
I received an IQ test score of 130-something back in the 1980's (I believe it was the Wechsler, not the Stanford-Binet) but online IQ tests are easy to get 140-160 on.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:50:27 No.11414331 Report

Quoted By: >>11414341

>>11414285

Idea was, that IQ tests check somehow narrow aspect, basically math and logic. It is quite useful abstraction, as usually those who are highly capable in math, also are capable in some other areas. In my experience, in most cases, successful people have way above average intellect. When quickly trying to find exceptions, those mostly are involved in professional sport. There genetics and persistence have more impact.

About low IQ people, quite often i see that they need to be "spoon feed", their capability for critical thinking, abstractions in different levels are somehow limited. In result, menial jobs for them are more comfortable.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 19:53:45 No.11414341 Report

Quoted By:

>>11414331
>In my experience, in most cases, successful people have way above average intellect
Bullshit. They definitely have above average intelligence, but only just.
>When quickly trying to find exceptions, those mostly are involved in professional sport.
Just look at any C-level exec ever, or investor.
>In result, menial jobs for them are more comfortable.
It's a lot more than that. They literally don't have the capacity for more than that.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO hard spacials.png, 21KiB, 1219x253

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 22:08:23 No.11414619 Report

Quoted By:

>>11414088
This was really hard, I'm surprised that I got a 120 on it

I took the test and by answering randomly and I got an 84, an IQ that can within one standard deviation of the mean... it seems like it could be inflated

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Untitled.jpg, 84KiB, 974x818

Anonymous Mon 24 Feb 2020 23:44:32 No.11414822 Report

Quoted By: >>11416123

>>11413864
>>11414088
My results for reference.
Didn't try too hard on either, ran out of time on the stanford binet and made a few stupid errors.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 00:59:53 No.11415006 Report

Quoted By: >>11417043 >>11418207 >>11418211

JCTI:

https://web.archive.org/web/20180701142825/http://www.cerebrals.org/jcti/index.html

Your score here is likely close or even lower than if you took the official WAIS.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 01:06:31 No.11415017 Report

Quoted By:

>>11414130
When I was 19 I payed to get tested by local Mensa. Scored >=135 so I assumed that was the highest score possible. It was timed and I remember answering every question, and only being uncertain about the very last one.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot (538).png, 54KiB, 1439x565

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 06:37:07 No.11415579 Report

Quoted By: >>11415670 >>11416123

I heavily doubt the percentile and they won't tell you the IQ, huge scam

Didn't think the questions were too reliable either

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 07:10:21 No.11415625 Report

Quoted By: >>11416171 >>11416200

It's not an IQ test in the traditional sense, you retards. They test the site visitors and take the average to be 100.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot (540).png, 38KiB, 1514x303

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 07:34:50 No.11415670 Report

Quoted By:

>>11415579
Here's the other one
Assuming blank answer = wrong answer, could have just skipped over ones I thought were too challenging instead of pondering over them too long, which would have meant I'd get to see all the questions.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO b-but I got more.png, 42KiB, 1220x489

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 10:31:46 No.11415872 Report

Quoted By:

Silly test, guessed all the ones that weren't just obvious to me.
Simply finishing the test guarantees a higher score.
Was fun.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO A527438D-0D8B-4E09-9291-D60274E1 (...).png, 1MiB, 1242x2208

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 11:01:28 No.11415900 Report

Quoted By: >>11415903 >>11415924 >>11416542

>>11413944
If from /fit/, like to browse here occasionally.. this any good??

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 11:03:41 No.11415903 Report

Quoted By: >>11415914

>>11415900
>this any good??
I mean, you literally posted the distribution curve along with your results, dude...

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 11:15:38 No.11415914 Report

Quoted By:

>>11415903
Wouldn’t have the slightest clue mate, don’t speak German and don’t know if this test is credible in any way. I was just having a browse for coronachan info on /sci/, really starting to bug out over it..

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO iqs.png, 6KiB, 960x188

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 11:24:26 No.11415920 Report

Quoted By: >>11419630 >>11420078

>>11413944
>https://www.free-iq-test.net/
found that one fairly easy, idk how accurate it is

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO mensadk.png, 248KiB, 1172x568

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 11:25:31 No.11415924 Report

Quoted By: >>11415985

>>11415900
>mensa.dk
that one was a little harder, perhaps more accurate

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO D3565B0D-6CCC-4B08-A4C7-AA612981 (...).png, 446KiB, 1242x2208

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 12:28:36 No.11415985 Report

Quoted By:

>>11415924
Should I go be getting tested? Shits easy as fuck.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 13:23:43 No.11416077 Report

Quoted By:

>>11414276
>Take it another time right after the first attempt
>"I think it's BS"

First try is the only reliable one.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 13:45:24 No.11416110 Report

Quoted By:

LOL. Got 46th percentile, but I'm hungover to hell and didn't answer even half the questions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 13:51:04 No.11416123 Report

Quoted By: >>11416171

>>11414822
>>11415579
>>11413864
Does getting 50 percentile in this test mean average IQ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 14:11:44 No.11416171 Report

Quoted By: >>11416193

>>11416123
See >>11415625
The explanation makes a lot of sense.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 14:24:03 No.11416193 Report

Quoted By: >>11416362

>>11416171
So how the fuck do you derive an IQ score from that

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 14:29:14 No.11416200 Report

Quoted By:

>>11415625
So getting 0 would be the best score?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 15:37:12 No.11416362 Report

Quoted By: >>11416395

>>11416193
It's not silly.
It's a percentile ranking on a test of 50 questions (or 100 if you did the longer one like me).
It's like IQ, but NOT IQ at all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 15:53:57 No.11416395 Report

Quoted By: >>11416412

>>11416362
So 20 percentile would mean you did better than 80% of test takers?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 16:04:08 No.11416412 Report

Quoted By: >>11416417

>>11416395
no retard
20 percentile means 80% did better than your brainlet ass

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 16:06:04 No.11416417 Report

Quoted By:

>>11416412
The average score on that test is 100, retard.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1.png, 37KiB, 1011x504

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 16:41:36 No.11416492 Report

Quoted By:

NOOOOO, I'M A BRAINLET

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 16:47:00 No.11416503 Report

Quoted By:

>>11413864
OP should kill himself for posting such a shitty test and wasting everyones time

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO low iq.png, 148KiB, 734x587

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 17:06:43 No.11416542 Report

Quoted By:

>>11415900
Got 126 as well. I started guessing after question 33 and finished it in 10 min. Think it's bullshit, if my IQ was that high I wouldn't feel so stupid.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO myscore.png, 55KiB, 1231x710

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2020 20:17:07 No.11417043 Report

Quoted By: >>11418207 >>11418211 >>11418461 >>11418796 >>11419610

>>11415006
WAIS IV FSIQ: 136
I don't remember my confidence intervals.
Pretty nice, they were pretty hard too.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO free.png, 15KiB, 1210x250

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 03:20:38 No.11418115 Report

Quoted By: >>11419630

>>11413944
pretty sure i fucked up the cube ones

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 03:24:26 No.11418127 Report

Quoted By: >>11418207 >>11418214

>>11413864
>Hey /sci/ is this test valid
There are no valid online IQ tests.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 04:11:12 No.11418207 Report

Quoted By: >>11418211 >>11418796

>>11418127
This one is >>11417043 >>11415006

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 04:12:28 No.11418211 Report

Quoted By:

>>11418207
>This one is >>11417043 >>11415006
There are no valid online IQ tests.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 04:13:29 No.11418214 Report

Quoted By: >>11418251 >>11419727

>>11418127
There aren't any valid offline IQ tests either.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 04:31:49 No.11418251 Report

Quoted By:

>>11418214
/thread

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO weadgesALAD.png, 15KiB, 570x226

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 07:08:44 No.11418461 Report

Quoted By: >>11418892

>>11417043
Does this test take your SATs into account and stuff because those are the only other tests I remembered taking? I wonder if the lack of information is pushing it towards the middle, if not then my results are plausible.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO DCD855A2-6E09-4058-A7F7-6E08F205 (...).png, 588KiB, 1242x2208

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 07:20:09 No.11418469 Report

Quoted By:

>>11413944
Really how credible are these things?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO iq.png, 20KiB, 925x329

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 08:11:39 No.11418530 Report

Quoted By: >>11418895

>>11413864
This is bullshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 12:48:52 No.11418790 Report

Quoted By:

My IQ is 140 on degraded mode (without my ADD meds)
The true predictor of how good you'll do in life is how fucked up or not was your childhood.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 12:56:07 No.11418796 Report

Quoted By: >>11418900

>>11417043
>>11418207
I got 126-135 on that version of the JCTI, but I heard it's deflated.
What could my actual result be?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 13:57:18 No.11418892 Report

Quoted By:

>>11418461
None of the extra information you provided affects your score, only your age.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 5862213378.png, 75KiB, 645x729

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 13:58:31 No.11418895 Report

Quoted By:

>>11418530
kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 14:01:31 No.11418900 Report

Quoted By:

>>11418796
Perhaps it could be the higher end of your confidence interval, 135.
Just a guess though. Really the only reason you might need an IQ test is if you are detrimentally insecure to the point that it affects your work, or you have a disorder that affects learning like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autism spectrum disorder.
If it really is causing you that much trouble and insecurity, spend the money and take the WAIS IV if you so please.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 19:18:25 No.11419610 Report

Quoted By: >>11419822

>>11417043
How legit is this test?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 19:30:43 No.11419630 Report

Quoted By: >>11420078

>>11418115
>>11415920
How much you got on the JCTI?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 20:21:56 No.11419727 Report

Quoted By:

>>11418214
Who knew that Taleb posts on /sci/ too? I knew his technical work is on generally on signal to noise ratio and applied probability, but I never figured he got off of /lit/ or Twitter for a few minutes to post on /sci/ as well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 21:06:50 No.11419822 Report

Quoted By:

>>11419610
Nothing like real matrices on the WAIS, but they were pretty hard so give it a shot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Feb 2020 22:45:24 No.11420078 Report

Quoted By:

>>11419630
this is me
>>11415920 i got 130 on the JCTI, which i'd say is the most accurate of all

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO I want to believe.png, 153KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Thu 27 Feb 2020 08:10:20 No.11421129 Report

Quoted By: >>11421179

>>11413864
I'm not paying $5

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Rushed test.png, 77KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Thu 27 Feb 2020 08:50:14 No.11421179 Report

Quoted By:

>>11421129

Tried the other and missed some... What's the point of these if you don't get feedback?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO asd.png, 24KiB, 1174x408

Anonymous Thu 27 Feb 2020 16:12:43 No.11421840 Report

Quoted By: >>11422259

>>11414098
Yeah this for me too
I just 'asd'ed those scrambled ones and called it a day

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Feb 2020 18:41:56 No.11422259 Report

Quoted By:

>>11421840
Yeah, I spent half the test sitting on those scrambled questions. Have never been good at them, and always hated that segment of Countdown with a passion. Will try again by just skipping them and see how I get on, because 8% percentile is a real kick in the teeth.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches