>>11410764Okay but how do you actually do that?
The problem is not the masses and their emotions for once it's that all of the candidates just lie and promise things they can't possibly know are feasible or not so they just end up making some small changes over the years while largely maintaining the decrepit status quo
It happened to Bush, Obama, Trump all of them
Big promises marginal results half of which get undone by the next guy anyway
Of course the idiot masses can't be trusted with literally anything but luckily it barely matters anyway you might as well roll a dice to decide who wins
Democracy is a feel good story but that doesn't mean it has the impact you might want to believe it does
In this sense it's perfect for assuaging the masses while maintaining an elite controlled society
People put far too much importance on the president when the real sticking point is the 100 other old guys whose names you don't even know and of course the layers of bureaucracy but you can't do much about that
But see this is an even further level of democracy which most people just aren't going to sink all the time and effort into especially when a lot of people can't even be bothered to engage with the system once in four years
And you know what all this literally all of it is made worthless by the fact that democracy and capitalism are obviously just not compatible and in fact run completely antithetical to each other
