>>11405968do we need to have this thread every two or three months?
the CIA website has tons of pseud shit. it runs the gamut from crank shit to newage druggie shit to eastern mysticism shit to mentalist mindreader crap. the fact that you can find all this kind of stuff on the CIA's website does not mean any of it is credible.
what it means is two things.
>1) the CIA investigates lots of outlandish claims, because it is in the interest of national security to be on the cutting-edge in case anything turns out rightbut more importantly,
2) in terms of counter-intelligence, or figuring out if there are any "moles" on your inside, you circulate weird information that, if and when the enemy finds it, will mindfuck them and set them off on the wrong course. if russians are wasting their time on the proof of god then that's good for us, and if you can track the source of the leak then you weed out moles.
look up "red mercury". basically a CIA program to promote a pseudoscience meme so that they could trick russians and identify leakers, and very clear in the retrospect of 2020
