>>11406888>>11407086>>11407174I love how this retard quotes and misinterprets Hume to support his moral skepticism when Hume literally says at the beginning of his Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals that
>Those who have denied the reality of moral distinctions, may be ranked among the disingenuous disputants...He basically dedicates one paragraph to explain why he retards like you are not even worth arguing with.
Also, when he Hume talks about how sentiment is the source of our moral distinctions it has ZERO to do with all the retarded crap you said. He is not even saying that morality is subjective in the way idiots like you understand that word.
You are just another pop-sci maggot who dismisses philosophy in general but then distort the philosophical positions of actual philosophers to try to prove your retarded claims. I bet you are also one of those retarded who spout "muh philosophy is a just spiele, the wikipedia page of Wittgenstein says that!"
