>>11404929Yea mate, I can just respond to each of your arguments with:
"And many women are willing."
There's an obese man who lives near me who REEEEEEEKS of oil, ass salts, armpit stank, tobacco, urine, shit, and alcohol, yet he gets laid with an ordinary skank every other week or so.
I don't know your point either, but it looks like it failed too. Stalemate :(
>>11404916>There are always more male incels than females for obviousobvious, yea
>Why not let men have their unique issue groupsSure let em have em. I think the uproar is more about the fact that there's lots of mass murderers on incel forums as well as a lot of mass murderer manifestos and ideations. A lota suggested violence towards women and society.... lol.
>then it's a male specific problemAh here, I would disagree! Lack of sex is not a male specific problem.
Lack of sex is a societal problem, always will be. Whether it be lack of baby-making for couples, lack of sex for the youth, or lack of sex mid-marriage, it is always a problem of the society that is realized in a problem of sex.
It is not a smart endeavor to treat sex from one side of the gender (unless you're a homo).
The current incel rage should not be viewed as a "male specific" problem, but a problem with sex alltogether. And I think every incel would agree with the viewpoint that there is today definitely a problem with sex - not just the mere female or male side, but a problem with sex that relates to all that is related to it, from economy to status to appearance to technology to culture to porn to advertising to movies to lack of time to lack of social activities to individualism to secularism etc. etc.
