>>11397621>to cope would be to suggest thatNo, it’s to suggest that you were beat and you’re not only assuming you were beat due to bullshit reason, but that in higher level classes they’d greatly underperform despite the fact that you have little objective evidence of how they would do at all and the little evidence you do have suggest they’d do at least as well you. Yet your subjective perception of them as retards is enough to completely drive that expectation to the bottom. Cope harder faggot.
>People who spend all of their time doing tasks unrelated to math, have no interest in math and do not plan to work with abstract mathematics are not generally good at higher level mathThey may not be good at higher math as a matter of fact, but what you were suggesting is something entirely different. That is, that they couldn’t have been good at higher level math even if they tried. The fact that someone doesn’t do something doesn’t mean they couldn’t be good at it. If you HAD to do some social science tract, do you really think you couldn’t pass it or even excel? I took philosophy as an elective and was miles ahead of all the other people in my class actually majoring in it, I just had no real interest in it. Lastly, get the fuck over yourself. Analysis isn’t some genius-level intellect requiring course. It’s just more abstract than calc courses/diff eq and is probably the first math course people take where memorizing steps to solve particular types of problems doesn’t work. Numerical analysis in my opinion was a harder course, and it’s orders of magnitude less abstract. Actually applying knowledge in novel useful ways is way harder than simply understanding the work others before you have done.
