I believe I can fully explain consciousness. To accuse myself of holding this belief does not accurately reflect the scale of my confidence. I believe that I can create formal proofs in relation to the nature, function, and structure of consciousness. The only limit I predict is the shared language necessary to communicate the full generality of the concepts involved. You will not like the terms I use because your proclivity as reasoning sapiences is to seek divergent philosophies even though ignorance must necessarily be continuous.

The first question you must present to yourself is whether or not your mind has the complexity necessary to temporarily forego the sense of agency that accompanies free and unrestricted thought such that you can overcome that experience at a later moment and restore natural autonomy without lasting damage to your psyche. It is not necessary to forego your own philosophy entirely, but merely to move it out of the way such that any parts of it that are currently wrong will not become terminal obstacles to further communication.

I have yet to verbalize the inner constructs that have led to my current beliefs. If you are interested in my thoughts then I ask that you exercise patience in understanding that they are not formalized in a linguistic capacity. Such a method of formalization would necessarily be incompatible with generalized hyperconceptuals.