>>11391479No, not as "robots" but perhaps as biological microorganisms designed as a tool for a single purpose.
>>11391924>>11392079>>11392146This. I'm glad a few anons have been listening to what I've been saying on /sci/ for while now.
Rule of thumb; if it has anything to do with humans, a biological solutions will ALWAYS be more practical than any mechanical thing we try to design for ourselves.
This has been true in the past, is true in the present, and will assumedly hold true into the future.
Consider for example how getting a kidney transplant is 1000000x better than staying on dialysis. The only people who advocate for renal dialysis are the bastards who make the machine itself, and the same will be the case in a techno-capitalist future.
And to all the robo mind-upload fags:
If we had a real, legitimate artificial intelligence running on some giga-supercomputer, and we told it to create an optimized design for intelligence, it would create something resembling the human brain. Among other things, the thermal-efficiency is beyond crazy.
See, Natural Selection did all the hard math for us already.
