>>11391137Im more convinced that male and females gender roles have simply been psychologically conditioned since the very beginning of our evolution, descending from the trees, males and females have always been predisposed towards certain roles.
Qualities and skills of the male gender given conditions over time tended towards planning, mental analysis of a situation, strategy, long term thinking, intellectualism, rationalism, mathematics, and engineering, this was psychologically conditioned for thousands of years, the same way female gender norms had been.
What if its the case due to environmental factors, its actually merely the female gender "catching up" to male standards of mathematics, rationalism, long term thinking and strategy, etc. , and that men in the past were actually making a fair judgement its not the best investment to educate females because civilization hadnt reached that level of development yet.
The other part of this logic is I believe you need accompanying ideas, even technologies, for "things to go right"; just because you can think of a case where women participate in science, engineering, mathematics, and other traditionally male gender roles, at an earlier point in time, doesnt mean everything would pan out well. Women arnt perfect just as men arnt; women also play villains in history. Who knows what that timeline could reveal.
