/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11389422

110KiB, 716x400, Hans.Eysenck.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 10:21:21 2020 No.11389422 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11389436 >>11389497 >>11389950 >>11390594 >>11390617 >>11390668 >>11391057 >>11392682 >>11392694 >>11394504 >>11395328 >>11398616

Mods read up.
This should make IQ threads bannable.
>Journals retract 13 papers by Hans Eysenck, Eysenck’s work has been the subject of scrutiny since the early 1990s. Some of it was cited heavily by Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein’s controversial book The Bell Curve.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 10:21:56 No.11389424 Report

Quoted By: >>11391124

Rest of the story here
https://retractionwatch.com/2020/02/12/journals-retract-three-papers-by-hans-eysenck-flag-18-some-60-years-old/

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 10:27:48 No.11389430 Report

Quoted By:

Niggers are stupid, cope more redditor.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 10:35:02 No.11389436 Report

Quoted By: >>11389982 >>11390645 >>11391903 >>11394189

>>11389422
(((OP)))

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1228943686953664512?s=19

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 11:05:59 No.11389479 Report

Quoted By:

https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=8028

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 11:25:11 No.11389497 Report

Quoted By: >>11389504

>>11389422
Why? I doubt too much damage has been done. Even from jsut the the titles, or the abstract, the papers are obviously bizarre and no sane reasonable person would take them seriosuly. Most of them seem to have nothing to do with IQ either.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 11:26:13 No.11389500 Report

Quoted By:

Why? I doubt too much damage has been done. Even from the abstracts, sometiems even the titles, the papers are obviously bizarre and no reasonable person would take them seriously. Most of them seem to have nothing to do with IQ either.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 11:27:58 No.11389504 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389497
> I doubt too much damage has been done.
Have you seen this board?
People preach passages from this book and they have the "official science" cited in the book to back it up.
Result is flood of shit that I dont want to see in the catalog.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 13:57:50 No.11389801 Report

Quoted By:

>unironic redditors become scientific journal editors
>delete articles they don't like?

nani?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 15:12:27 No.11389950 Report

Quoted By: >>11389955

>>11389422
Also the "Racism outside of /b/" global rule.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 15:15:48 No.11389955 Report

Quoted By: >>11389957 >>11392447 >>11394423 >>11398152

>>11389950
Define racism. Is the acknowledgement of the difference in genetic ancestry of different groups racism?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 15:17:01 No.11389957 Report

Quoted By: >>11389973 >>11390312 >>11392449 >>11392453 >>11398251

>>11389955
Thinly veiling your bullshit doesnt mean we dont know exactly why you make the threads

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 15:26:30 No.11389973 Report

Quoted By: >>11390319 >>11390320 >>11391216

>>11389957
Don’t dodge the question. Why is biology magically different for our species?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 15:31:47 No.11389982 Report

Quoted By: >>11390302

>>11389436
The absolute seething hypocrisy in these comments kek.
The sexual market relies entirely around eugenics.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 17:26:13 No.11390302 Report

Quoted By: >>11390346

>>11389982
>>The sexual market relies entirely around eugenics.
There's something very suspect about the idea of a sexual "market". The idea of base animal functions and urges being entirely contained within the sphere of human activity in which things and services are exchanged seems like an ideological projection of human activity into nature and reality e.g. intelligent design, "nature is cruel", etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 17:30:44 No.11390312 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389957
Ah yes, the good old "alt-right dogwhistle" complaint when you don't have an argument.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 17:32:22 No.11390319 Report

Quoted By: >>11391063

>>11389973
so you support Affirmative Action?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 17:33:16 No.11390320 Report

Quoted By: >>11395804

>>11389973
Why do we not use the word race when discussing any other species?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1200px-AdopteUnMec_Logo.svg.png, 59KiB, 1200x1031

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 17:47:32 No.11390346 Report

Quoted By: >>11390541 >>11390935

>>11390302
Deluded, Tinder is basically an eshop where males offer themselves and are selected or disqualified by women within 3 seconds of looking at 1-2 pictures. It's pretty much a genetical fitness test.

Almost all human interactions have been commodified nowadays and sex is probably the oldest one with prostitution, but now we reached new peaks with internet where a pool of women can pick among an extremely competitive pool of tens if not hundreds of thousands of males.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 18:52:09 No.11390541 Report

Quoted By:

>>11390346
I'm not really buying this picture of an insect-like sexual competition. I don't think the numbers, sex ratio, or w/e are suggesting 1000 males to 1 female. Even if we had a local community where that was true, another would have it where it was false so that we reach some general average of 100 or 110 males to 100 females. Would this be a massive oversupply of men or undersupply of women if we were to take this marketplace analogy further? How would the markets react to these conditions? Produce less men or more women? In either case we now would see some sort of reverse scenario of the sexual market where several women are competing for a select few men, in fact we might have seen manifestations of this in history with polyamorous or polygamous relationships, but the sexual marketplace analogy gets more and more bizarre when we try to fit everything we know into the framework of a marketplace.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 19:15:18 No.11390594 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389422
>Authors, reviewers, editors and interested readers should consult the ethics section of the SAGE website and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) website for guidelines on publication ethics.
Sage and Cope.
Pottery.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 313213213213.jpg, 153KiB, 943x623

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 19:20:06 No.11390617 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389422
>also everyone should be more tolerant unlike those rasis right wingers.
.jpg+yarmulke=OP.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 19:27:59 No.11390645 Report

Quoted By: >>11391903 >>11394430

>>11389436
the comments are literally npcs' brains boiling up cause he dared to have a thought.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1577812925312.gif, 58KiB, 570x537

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 19:34:35 No.11390668 Report

Quoted By: >>11390812 >>11390857

>>11389422
Why didn't you post a full and proper quote you subverting garbage person?
>Two journals have retracted 13 papers co-authored by the late — and controversial — psychologist Hans Eysenck, following a university investigation that found dozens of his papers to be “unsafe.”
it is retracted by marxist staff due to the npcs triggering.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 20:36:30 No.11390812 Report

Quoted By:

>>11390668
>it is retracted by marxist staff due to the npcs triggering.
Marxists don't do work and are at home asking for handouts.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 20:45:30 No.11390857 Report

Quoted By: >>11390990

>>11390668
That's not even the full quote either.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:12:06 No.11390935 Report

Quoted By:

>>11390346
Imagine the future of all these single mothers raising chad's hundreds of kids

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:15:14 No.11390944 Report

Quoted By: >>11390995 >>11391825

Smarter men seem to have more kids but smarter women seem to have fewer kids.
Is there were a way to increase the fecundity of smarter women?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:28:38 No.11390970 Report

Quoted By:

Another IQtard rekt

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:36:19 No.11390990 Report

Quoted By: >>11391203

>>11390857
>The results reported by Eysenck and Grossarth-Maticek were implausible and incompatible with modern clinical science and the understanding of disease processes.
>incompatible with (((modern))) clinical science and the understanding

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:38:07 No.11390995 Report

Quoted By:

>>11390944
Who is more prideful and greedy? The smart man or the smart women?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:56:08 No.11391056 Report

Quoted By: >>11391058 >>11391192

>Retracted articles
>Sport Activity and Personality as Elements in Preventing Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease. Perceptual and Motor Skills
>Antismoking Attitudes and General Prejudice: An Empirical Study. Perceptual and Motor Skills
>The Prediction of Death from Cancer by Means of Personality/Stress Questionnaire: Too Good to Be True? Perceptual and Motor Skills
>Is Media Information That Smoking Causes Illness a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy? Psychological Reports
>Length of Survival and Lymphocyte Percentage in Women with Mammary Cancer as a Function of Psychotherapy. Psychological Reports
>Personality, Stress and Disease: Description and Validation of a New Inventory. Psychological Reports
>Personality, Smoking, and Alcohol as Synergistic Risk Factors for Cancer of the Mouth and Pharynx. Psychological Reports
>Coca-Cola, Cancers, and Coronaries: Personality and Stress as Mediating Factors. Psychological Reports
>Personality, Stress, and Motivational Factors in Drinking as Determinants of Risk for Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease. Psychological Reports
>Alcohol Consumption and Health: Synergistic Interaction with Personality. Psychological Reports
>Prediction of cancer and coronary heart disease as a function of method of questionnaire administration. Psychological Reports
>Prediction of Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease Mortality by Means of a Personality Inventory: Results of a 15-Year Follow-up Study. Psychological Reports
>Does Smoking Really Kill Anybody? Psychological Reports

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:57:21 No.11391057 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389422
Ahahahaha you do realise this just adds to the case that modern science is a fucking joke and not searching for truths right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:57:25 No.11391058 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391056
>another 60 flagged
list them

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 21:58:27 No.11391063 Report

Quoted By: >>11391075

>>11390319
Affirmative action is based on the idea that everyone is equal, and that it's purely environment suppressing potential

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 22:03:12 No.11391075 Report

Quoted By: >>11391094 >>11391961

>>11391063
No retard it’s that everyone be should stand equal in a society, and efforts are made to enable this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 22:09:39 No.11391094 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391075
Everyone is equal retard, we all have the same rights, the manifest inequalities are genetically driven

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 22:24:34 No.11391124 Report

Quoted By: >>11391212

>>11389424
>https://retractionwatch.com/2020/02/12/journals-retract-three-papers-by-hans-eysenck-flag-18-some-60-years-old/
Top comment on the page says it all:
>The reference to “The Bell Curve” is gratuitous and unfair. Of the hundreds of citations in that book, three are of Eysenck’s articles. Two of those articles are about the effectiveness of vitamin supplements as a treatment for IQ, and one is about the correlation between IQ and reaction time. None of the citations are related to Eysenck’s shoddy work in health psychology, and Grossarth-Maticek’s work isn’t cited at all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 22:55:48 No.11391192 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391056
I thought the smokling lobby was dead already?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO fullstory.png, 2MiB, 660x8405

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 23:00:43 No.11391203 Report

Quoted By: >>11391489

>>11390990
>Two journals have retracted 13 papers co-authored by the late — and controversial — psychologist Hans Eysenck, following a university investigation that found dozens of his papers to be “unsafe.”
>One of the journals, Perceptual and Motor Skills, subjected 36 of Eysenck’s papers to expressions of concern, while another — Psychological Reports — subjected 25 of them to the same flag. Both journals are published by SAGE.
>A May 2019 report by King’s College London into the work of Eysenck and Ronald Grossarth-Maticek, apparently of the University Heidelberg, that more than two dozen papers be retracted. Among other issues, the report cited
>the implausibility of the results presented, many of which show effect sizes virtually unknown in medical science.
>The notice in Perceptual and Motor Skills reads:
>The following articles have been retracted as a result of King’s College London’s review of certain publications authored by Hans J. Eysenck with Ronald Grossarth-Maticek on the subject of personality and certain health outcomes. The King’s College London review committee recommended that the articles in their review be retracted due to finding they are unsafe, specifically noting the following:
>— Concerns with the validity of the datasets, including the “recruitment of participants, administration of measures, reliability of outcome ascertainment, biases in data collection, absence of relevant covariates, and selection of cases analysed in each article.”
>— The results reported by Eysenck and Grossarth-Maticek were implausible and incompatible with modern clinical science and the understanding of disease processes.
>The King’s College London report may be read here: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/statements/hans-eysenck

be careful fellow anons. Very many jewish tricks lie in the report.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 23:04:43 No.11391212 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391124
>shoddy work
>implying some of it is ok even though in his whole academic career only produced hogwash thus this article
k lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 23:05:19 No.11391216 Report

Quoted By: >>11391219

>>11389973
Why should I engage in what is obviously a bad faith question?

I'm not going to play your game.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Feb 2020 23:07:59 No.11391219 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391216
So you're a creationist right? Since clearly you're trying to dodge saying divergent evolution exists

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 00:54:24 No.11391489 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391203
What a load of bullshit. There are endless amounts of bullshit papers pushed by everyone and published in the likes of nature or science, papers that are such bullshit a child can point out everything that's wrong with them. Yet THIS is what they demand be retracted? Where are they when other bullshit papers are getting fingers from the entire community pointed at them? If anything this gives credence in the findings if you ask me.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 253KiB, 1061x1140

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 01:11:41 No.11391532 Report

Quoted By: >>11395727

$soi$

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 03:26:49 No.11391793 Report

Quoted By:

And it's a nothing burger.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 03:38:51 No.11391811 Report

Quoted By:

People are still coping about divergent evolution?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 03:45:39 No.11391825 Report

Quoted By: >>11391837

>>11390944
You're just conflating being smart with achieving goals in science and business.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 03:51:46 No.11391837 Report

Quoted By: >>11391848

>>11391825
I don't follow your argument

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 03:56:39 No.11391848 Report

Quoted By: >>11392600

>>11391837
Why is it you say smart women have fewer babies?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 04:31:20 No.11391903 Report

Quoted By: >>11394501

>>11389436
>>11390645
it's low-tier trolling, of course it's going to get responses.

>pedophilia is wrong, and i totally don't condone it, but that doesn't logically lead to the conclusion that lolis aren't sexually attractive.
>i'm totally not a racist, but it's just a simple fact that if we killed all the blacks, absolute crime levels would be decreased.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 04:55:37 No.11391961 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391075
everyone has equal rights now. blacks and browns are just generally duller, because of lack of IQ, which is almost entirely determined by genes. they are quite difficult to civilize because of this

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 11:24:07 No.11392447 Report

Quoted By: >>11394163

>>11389955
Nice projection faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 11:25:10 No.11392449 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389957
Nice projection insecure faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 11:26:15 No.11392453 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389957
Nice projection insecure nigger

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 12:36:04 No.11392600 Report

Quoted By: >>11394898

>>11391848
because that's what the evidence points to.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 12:45:54 No.11392617 Report

Quoted By:

>psychology
isn't a science
IQ is fantasy perpetuated by Jews
WHERE ARE THE FUCKING MODS GODDAMIT

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 13:20:41 No.11392682 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389422
>Mods can you please censor this specific discussion? Don't really care about the fact that 90% of the board is off-topic trash, just make sure that the on-topic IQ threads are gone thanks.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 13:24:31 No.11392694 Report

Quoted By: >>11392702 >>11392711

>>11389422
First IQ was racist. Now its debunked. Yet every second thread here devolves into "I have higher IQ than you".

Kek. Just look at who in each field of science has the most citations then see which races appear the most.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 13:26:31 No.11392702 Report

Quoted By: >>11392707

>>11392694
>Kek. Just look at who in each field of science has the most citations then see which races appear the most.

more science .....

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 13:29:16 No.11392707 Report

Quoted By: >>11392866

>>11392702
It correlates perfectly to IQ. That doesn't mean geniuses like Sylvester James Gates and Lisa Randell don't exist, they certainly do. But this is only seen as a problem for genuine racists who can't seem to look past IQ. The fact is it's a measure of your ability to learn.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 13:31:26 No.11392711 Report

Quoted By:

>>11392694
>Kek. Just look at who in each field of science has the most citations then see which races appear the most.
Didn't you hear anon? It's generational trauma from slavery encoded in the genes that stops them from getting nobel prizes. Africans who were neither ever enslaved nor are any poorer than the average westerner and live like lords in their nations, yet produce zero science anyway? Well that's because of institutional racism and transference of trauma from their comrades in America.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 14:50:44 No.11392866 Report

Quoted By:

>>11392707
>IQ. The fact is it's a measure of your ability to learn.
that's not what IQ is

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 16:27:28 No.11393220 Report

Quoted By:

How many of you actually read the bell curve? Seriously? I bet all those people that got butthurt don't even know what they wrote.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1573578837986.png, 680KiB, 771x723

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 21:55:53 No.11394163 Report

Quoted By:

>>11392447
not how that's used, bot

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO eugenics.png, 416KiB, 1827x926

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 22:02:15 No.11394189 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389436
is this true?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 23:12:24 No.11394423 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389955
Cladistic race doesn't exist
Stop pretending it does

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 23:13:26 No.11394430 Report

Quoted By:

>>11390645
Thoughts usually require thinking

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 23:33:16 No.11394501 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391903
>retard take
It's not trolling to recognize that "eugenics" is what all of modern agriculture is based on and remind people of it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 23:33:30 No.11394504 Report

Quoted By: >>11394513

>>11389422
Every IQ """"""""""""statistics"""""""""" is bullshit because there has never been actual scientifically done IQ tests for large groups of random people in every country, "race", or any other group. I thought everybody already knew this. But only the retards didn't. That was the real IQ test. Most IQ stats are """"""""estimates"""""" made by things like how "well" a society works etc. But that's bullshit. IQ tests measure reasoning skills. How well a society works isn't decided by deductive and inductive reasoning skills.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 23:36:31 No.11394513 Report

Quoted By: >>11394519 >>11395867

>>11394504
>How well a society works isn't decided by deductive and inductive reasoning skills.
It pretty much is though. how do you run institutions or businesses without these?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 23:38:22 No.11394519 Report

Quoted By: >>11394525

>>11394513
Pretty well apparently

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Feb 2020 23:39:54 No.11394525 Report

Quoted By:

>>11394519
You'll need to give some examples for anyone to take you seriously here anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 01:43:39 No.11394898 Report

Quoted By: >>11396344

>>11392600
Taking statistical meta trends that have emerged in the past 30 or so years as evidence that you can project into the future is poor form

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 05:00:34 No.11395328 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389422
Mods. This should make anti-racism a bannable offense.

Steven Jay Gould, an anti-racist activist intentionally committed academic and scientific fraud against Samuel Morton's skull measurement. That is far worse then OP. In fact, OP doesn't even debunk IQ.

Anti-racism is pseudoscience, and "racism" is an anti-genetics canard. OP doesn't belong on this board.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 05:03:43 No.11395335 Report

Quoted By: >>11395809

When are we going start getting rid of anti-IQ fuckfaces and admit that they are just a bunch of people who are denying genetics and IQ? OP needs be fucking thrown in jail, not allowed to spread his lies and pretend they are acceptable lies to hold.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 09:24:05 No.11395727 Report

Quoted By:

>>11391532
>intelligence is decreasing while religious fundamentalism is increasing worldwide
>society needs intelligent specialists and upper class to function, i.e. how will nuclear power plants be maintained or decommissioned (50 year process) and avoid human error with catastrophic results with lowered pop. int.
>ignore evidence of genetic based intelligence and ethnic differences, deem eugenics unethical
>when society collapses due to dysgenics billions will die and we'll enter a new dark age, making anti-eugenics immoral

These retards are the most dense and myopic idiots. There is only maliciousness about these "intelligent" individuals who can't think of scenarios ahead of 1 generation into the future and rationalizes their ignorant positions through political correctness. Science and policy making should have the far future in mind with regards to our biology and resource limitations, yet these mainstream sheep deny our biology.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 09:44:37 No.11395760 Report

Quoted By:

what these anti-IQ and race difference denial clowns are afraid of is the implication that if these ideas were to become mainstream it would lead to policies of increased discrimination, racial divide and genocide etc. It is purely irrational fear that goes against science. Just because certain groups average intelligence are lower or higher doesn't mean that the individual can be judged by their group average. In fact there are many positive policy options available if we recognize the innate differences. For example we could accommodate each individual according to their intelligence in education and perhaps in work as to allow them to reach their own potential, rather than letting intelligent individuals be dragged down by a slow curriculum or less intelligent ones giving up and becoming outsiders/welfare recipients.
https://youtu.be/lev8dGnxvdw
https://youtu.be/lk8sdMGJ3m4

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 10:07:10 No.11395804 Report

Quoted By:

>>11390320
Because “breed” means something else and we’d rather not think about it

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 10:10:04 No.11395809 Report

Quoted By:

>>11395335
Facts don't care about your feelings. IQ is not science so it's not fact

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 10:19:21 No.11395822 Report

Quoted By: >>11395834

Okay wait what’s going on here? Was this guy really a hack? I mean what he was supposedly saying is obviously true. Does this mean someone else came up with it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 10:23:27 No.11395834 Report

Quoted By: >>11395838 >>11396359

>>11395822
No it means all his sources are shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 10:25:56 No.11395838 Report

Quoted By:

>>11395834
Why is that such a big deal?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 11:04:36 No.11395867 Report

Quoted By: >>11396348

>>11394513
No it isn't. Prove that how well society works is dictated by IQ ie deductive and inductive reasoning skills. Protip: you can't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 16:19:33 No.11396344 Report

Quoted By: >>11396376

>>11394898
Black American women have an extremely dysgenic fertility rate. 70 IQ black women had approx 3.5 kids while 130 IQ black women had approx 0.5 kids

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 16:21:23 No.11396348 Report

Quoted By:

>>11395867
show me a map of vs IQ

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 16:24:58 No.11396359 Report

Quoted By:

>>11395834
Herrnstein and Murray's? how do three only tangentally related studies that were refferenced by the bell curve but have very little impact on the actual text have any impact on the validity of the Bell Curve itself. frankly it has held up for almost 30 years when competing theories to explain attainment differences have withered away in 10

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 16:31:21 No.11396376 Report

Quoted By: >>11396604

>>11396344
women have the most important job possible, ie choosing the characteristics of the next generation, and society is currently accepting of them shirking this in favor of pursuing education and careers. incentives such as maternal leave, tax breaks for each kid an intelligent woman has, etc never work. seems like the current system can only be dysgenic in the long run

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 18:13:15 No.11396604 Report

Quoted By:

>>11396376
There's an argument about consanguinity and a prezygotic effect on fertility observed in many species
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/11265272/#11265272

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 18:20:20 No.11396618 Report

Quoted By: >>11396638

IQ has been and will continue to be the best predictive measure we have of underlying intelligence and success in life and society. cope

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO scale2.jpg, 264KiB, 1381x920

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 18:35:36 No.11396638 Report

Quoted By: >>11396649 >>11398670

>>11396618
>the best
doesn't imply that it's any good

hourglasses were once the best way we had to tell time
pic related was once the best way we had to determine weight
etc.

it's just not good enough for what you want to use it for. cope? "it's the best we have" is the cope

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2020 18:40:51 No.11396649 Report

Quoted By:

>>11396638
yes this measure which has withstood decades of attacks and is very successful is not useful. cope.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2020 05:31:25 No.11398152 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389955
Oh, you’re so smart and wise! Even your inner monologue says so! uwu

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO t2nyp1nfgkg41.jpg, 87KiB, 1024x958

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2020 06:01:20 No.11398198 Report

Quoted By:

The whole "debate" is incredibly frustrating because you can feel every nitpick, rationalization and justification possible thrown out in a mad, desperate attempt to ignore the repeated, abject and universal failures of subsaharan Africans, absolutely anywhere they go.

It's like if millions of people dedicated every waking moment of their lives to persecuting everyone who says the sky is blue, and therefore a social consensus develops where everyone agrees to tell blatant lies to each other in public.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2020 06:31:43 No.11398251 Report

Quoted By:

>>11389957
is this just plain old paranoia or are there actual voices in your head telling you what other people think?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2020 10:07:39 No.11398535 Report

Quoted By:

THE FUCKING 3 PAPERS CITED IN TBC BY THIS GUYS ARE FOR BOOSTING IQ WITH VITAMINES (NOT RETRACTED) AND REACTION TIMES IQ CORRELATION (REPLICATED THOUSANDS OF TIMES) YOU NIGGERS

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2020 11:00:33 No.11398616 Report

Quoted By: >>11398654

>>11389422
Wait. So they're detracting other papers from this man not because those papers are factually false, but because they disagree with something he said in a different paper?
What the fuck?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2020 11:30:05 No.11398654 Report

Quoted By:

>>11398616
Welcome to modern science (tm)

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2020 11:39:00 No.11398670 Report

Quoted By:

>>11396638
Balance scales are very good, as long as the weights are good too (and they can be if you use a scale to make them).
They're just a bit inconvenient to use, but they're very precise.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches