I think that time is not a fundamental aspect of the universe and is only intrinsically definable to it's own respective observer.
2nd law of thermodynamics: In any process that involves a cycle, the entropy (complexity) of a given system can only either stay the same or get worse.
In fundamental physics, one violation of this clause is parity violations. Essentially, the conservation of parity implies that you can get the same result if you run an experiment with a particle and the mirror of that particle. Physics doesn't care about the orientation or spin.
Parity is violated in a few different places, but a notable one is beta decay. This proves that there are interactions that create a "flow of change".
I pose that all Time is is another word for the "Entropy" or complexity of the brain. Our brain is really good at processing information, finding patterns, and wiring connections and shortcuts so that we can process information. What if humans are able to distinguish between when they have "less wiring" and "more wiring" and we've called it time?
Following this claim, I would also propose that if an observer were incapable of making the observation regarding the "wiring" then they would also be incapable of observing the phenomena known as time.
2nd law of thermodynamics: In any process that involves a cycle, the entropy (complexity) of a given system can only either stay the same or get worse.
In fundamental physics, one violation of this clause is parity violations. Essentially, the conservation of parity implies that you can get the same result if you run an experiment with a particle and the mirror of that particle. Physics doesn't care about the orientation or spin.
Parity is violated in a few different places, but a notable one is beta decay. This proves that there are interactions that create a "flow of change".
I pose that all Time is is another word for the "Entropy" or complexity of the brain. Our brain is really good at processing information, finding patterns, and wiring connections and shortcuts so that we can process information. What if humans are able to distinguish between when they have "less wiring" and "more wiring" and we've called it time?
Following this claim, I would also propose that if an observer were incapable of making the observation regarding the "wiring" then they would also be incapable of observing the phenomena known as time.
