>>11384059actually now that I look at your proof (I didnt care before I just gave you the benefit of the doubt), the second line doesnt even look right. The right side of the second line is ambiguous with its garbage notation and the original equation isnt even true btw, here is the proof that its false
and since sqrt(2)/4 is not equal to sqrt(2)/2, by uniqueness of prime factorization, the original statement is false
