>>11382413>speculative future technologyMore computational power is not speculative, neither is a simulation. We run simulations on things all the time already, often with arbitrarily changed parameters in regards to the laws of physics. For that reason, there's no reason to think that the speed of light, conservation of energy, etc. aren't all arbitrary rules set by the creator of our simulation.
>such a perfect and flawless simulation to even existPerfect and flawless by what standards? That makes no sense. For all we know in the universe running "our" simulation the laws are completely different, and the creation of our simulation wasn't challenging. They might also think it's a buggy piece of shit intern project.
