The specific science of aerodynamic lift is apparently not fully resolved, what do you think the answer is? I think they are stuck in a false 2 sided paradigm and that its both low pressure and high pressure with angle of attack, they act like you cant say its both and, it does bother me they always say its the low pressure with the stupid airfoil demonstration. Even as a 5 year old I knew there was more to it, the high pressure according to Newton's law is the dominant factor, considering airfoil can fly upside down. What is wrong with the world it seems like less of an issue than they make it out to be? I believe the faster air on top thing is not quite right and its mainly the low pressure creating vacuum and suction. Along with angle of attack with high pressure. They act like angle of attack is action and reaction and not high pressure, would that not create high pressure they are not exclusive. wtf

here is the article that got me thinking, read it;

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/no-one-can-explain-why-planes-stay-in-the-air/?utm_source=pocket-newtab