>>11371177Keep in mind that we what it means that an animal is "extinct" is a bit fuzzy and not entirely understood. Some animals which are said to be "extinct" aren't really, it's just that the electric field is different now (starved) than when we were in the polar configuration, and they've merely "devolved" (and solely due to the electric field). The ebner effect has shown that some animals (trout fish for example) "revive" themselves right back into an "extinct" state of existence (in other words as they supposedly looked a very long time ago), when born under a different electric field. So for those cases it's not that there's one seperate species which went extinct and one which didn't - rather, it's just one species.
It probably doesn't apply to most dinosaurs, but one species this most certainly applies to is the "Irish elk". It's much more likely that it simply "devolved" into what for us today are normal elks. If placed under the correct electric field you could probably make an ordinary elk embryo turn into something very "Irish elk" looking.
