>>11361014This is probably bait, but violence is not necessarily a bad thing.
Why do women with their weak, flabby bodies constantly use psychological warfare to extract resources out of others and maintain status, then cry when somebody gets into a fist fight in front of them? It's basically equivalent. I think it was Schopenhauer who said that women have manipulation like a lion has teeth - you just need enough of a sense of perspective to see that not every other living thing is like you in its abilities. The only difference between aggressive manipulation and physical violence that the gender that uses physical instead of psychological violence is also the gender that deals in litres, metres and tonnes of water, steel, conrete and fertiliser. If the world was female conflict would be constant whining, bitching and complaining, sure, until the people living in huts realised it was time to feebly fight for food scraps again because they couldn't into long-term planning or the spatial intelligence necessary to map out a society more advanced than neolithic subsistence villages with no plumbing, electricity or architecture beyond daub and cow shit dwellings.
The holocaust, if it happened, was also ethnic self defence against a subversive fifth column that had been shit-stirring for thousands of years and was therefore completely justified. You don't just respond to people who want you impoverished, enslaved, lied to and dead by nicely asking them to stop, having a tantrum so they feel bad for you or annoyingly guilt-tripping them into apologising, you fucking kill them and throw their bodies into ovens. That's where men come to the rescue.
