No.11358471 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How does one contend with the so-called fine-tuning of the physical constants of the universe? The anthropic principle has been posed before, which seems reasonable prima facie, but upon just a little rigor, the probability of even a super-meGa-multi-multiverse having a world conducive to any conceivable life is still metaphysically 1/infinity, which according to wolfram alpha is really just 0.

A multiverse makes everything (metaphysically) possible, possible; it doesn't make everything (epistemically) possible, possible. So now that we're rid that poorly-conceived concept, how do you contend with the so-called fine-tuning of the physical constants of the universe?

Occam says God did it.

I think God is simply an undiscovered force, to whom you can pick and choose attributes until He's no longer palatable, like this is fucking Yogurtland. For now, let's start with God as a vanilla undiscovered force with added infinitely-intelligent sprinkles. Omnipotence, omnibenevolence, etc. are an acquired taste you can analyze later.

MODS, unrangeban me from posting threads on /pol/ or my shitposting shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.