>>11357515Many fetishes CAN arise from porn simply providing fuel for them.
Most porn-based fetishes (really weird ones like nipple insertion or vore) are simply a chimera-like stimulus for different parts of the brain related to sexual arousal/attraction (+nearby non-sexual areas), that normally wouldn't get activated together by anything in reality. It's literally hacking the brain into activating the most boner-y response possible, even if it doesn't make sense. Different fetishes fit different brains too, so some people don't respond to any fetish-y things, but some people get hit HARD by certain ones, and they can't really help their reaction to it, since it was literally designed to hit all the arousal areas of their brain.
Porn is the only thing that could provide any of these visually-activated "arousal hacks" that most others could only conceive of in a wild drug-induced dream. Yet here we are, able to stare at hundreds of different visual examples in high definition and full-color, many even animated or three-dimensional, fueling fetishes that shouldn't even exist to the point that they become the only thing that truly "hits the spot".
Hard to complain about it, too. Considering how sexual selection has changed after the advent of everyday global communication (internet socialization), it seems that "average" is no longer good enough when anyone can see and contact any person in their prime ages, filtering for everybody with a movie star face and a porn star body, with a vast majority of most individuals (ranging from below-average to above) seeking only the same minority of highly desirable ones. For those who are left out, and find that even fish at the bottom of the barrel are aiming straight past them, they at least have some kind of sexual fulfillment that would otherwise be completely absent from their lives. It's the same thing with ASMR girlfriend simulators - Can you really blame them, when for some people it's the closest they'll ever get?