>>11356389yes, it turns out that almost immediately after he published his theory it got debunked:
https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2658and ever since, Garrett has been saying lots of really contrived nonsense to try and make it plausible in light of the debunkage, but all of it is grasping at straws which make whatever he claims is still viable absolutely not "exceptionally simple" any more, in fact what he says now is extremely ugly and bending-over-backwards
BTW he is a larper -- he is totally unqualified to talk about high-energy theory or GUT stuff since he is actually a lame biophysicist, pic related
