>>11355080The onus is on you that human behaviour, qualia, and logic isn't an emergent behaviour demonstrated by sufficiently complex systems. (remember, we have systems with varying complexity already - it's called animals, and we can measure their "approximation" to human intelligence and social capcities in edge cases such as great apes/chimps.)
If you do concede the first point, you'll have to demonstrate that the complexity in such a system is not replicable outside of biological means (a stance shared by preachers, which in the end does sound right for a social science practitioner who'd take it onto himself to "identify autism outside of human intelligence")
