>>11352172It's just the natural course of adaptation to experience, I'm not sure what's so ambiguous about it, it's simple fatigue. Basically I've been researching for over 6 years now. I've presented to state senate committees, I've made threads on here and replied to people elsewhere, I've talked to people I've known for ten years to my entire life, I've talked to acquaintances. I have a packet full of hard data and summaries 3 inches thick, and even if you can get people to read a single sentence on one page. Nothing changes. The data is ignored.
Mediafire has download counters, which is part of why I use it. I stress to people how important this is, give a general overview of what's going on and how we got here, the effect it's having on whatever thing is relevant particularly their children and grandchildren,. Write down the link. Nothing. They never read it or download a single file.
I don't get much from talking about the effects of electromagnetic fields on biological systems generally. I use some (too much) time this way nonetheless because I recognize it's necessary and I have an obligation to inform others ,where they've indicated some interest and potential to benefit. There is nothing more important than one's health. And there's a much bigger picture here, as well. Meaningless terms, however, until you live it.
>>11352175As far as this guy goes, he likes to post that pastebin often. Some of the posts are mine, some of them aren't. His accuracy isn't horrible, but it's not great either. I came back after several months and found some threads where he'd labeled other posters as "The" 5G schizo. I've been over his link in full prior, which naturally he would never include. He seems to trawl the archives, like any good story he establishes a hard skeleton, then he looks for posts to flesh it and weave together into a compelling narrative.
I usually just ignore him. I'd like to think the irony wouldn't be lost on most people.
