Hi guys, what do you think of this proof?
Is this valid second order logics?
Can you prove k for imaginary dots of matter?
Anyways, its all mathematical metaphysics when translated in the Lemma. I hope you will find it interesting and maybe prove me wrong.

Lemma : A puncto materiae, ad omni loca spatium, est necessario maiorem numeram, qui infinitatem naturae materia locum habet loca logicum, into spatio-tempus puncto ad infinitum re loco. Igitur materia, quae ratione infinitae loco altius quae natura esse ad numeri et integri a numeri infinitus, quod puncto e materiali re materialis unum.