>>11346465You are making the claim not everything is stuff, when we have no good reason not to think so by the pure quality of stuff being fucking obvious.
Everything being stuff = Obvious = 1
Everything not being stuff = Not obvious = 0
Science has explained some stuff already, so logically. It makes more logical reason to believe it is likely Science could explain more stuff, perhaps even all stuff. Than it is to believe some stuff is ''not-stuff''
-
Then again I get the feeling you already know the answer to this but will ignore it to jerk your own ideas for whatever reason that might be
