>>11344613I didn't interact with other people that much as a kid. If I had been shown how to make artificial intelligence as a kid, I would have enjoyed it. I didn't learn how to code until I was 27.
The computer programs I make are an extension of myself. Therefore, I'm more like a computer than an animal.
The human brain is more categorically significant than genetics and other biological function. Imagine making a computer program that's like an animal. Would anyone say it's like a human? No, the two categories could not be more different.
A super intelligence would basically just be faster version of a person. Something that takes a lifetime, it would do in a minute. The same cannot be said of the relation between animals and humans.
This post could never have been written by an animal. Even if the animal was immortal. Therefore, a human is more like a super intelligence i.e such as God or the combined intelligence of all humans than it is like an animal or the combined intelligence of all animals.
"Combined intelligence of all animals" isn't really saying much since animals are not capable of such cooperation. It's the ability to share information without limit (except for life expectancy) which makes us human.
