>>11340644I still don’t understand, are people who consistently underperform relative to the top scorers in quantitatively challenging classes immoral and selfish incel autistic loser retards, but not by virtue of birth only because of their wicked parents and their rotten souls, or is it because of the educational system’s incompetence? When some guy couldn’t grasp why the law of sines works and fails his precalc midterm even after being taught precisely the proof and proper application of the method is he just evil? I’m very confused, it seems as if you think that there is an inherent, inviolable defficiency in those who seem to never do what’s right and try harder at the math they keep fucking up when examined on what they’re trying so halfheartedly to learn. Now I understand you might think this is unfair, perhaps its racism or unfair apportionment of animal crackers for solving trig integrals at 5 versus spending all day playing gamecube but I just want to understand what I am so blind to. Every person I’ve met who was very bad at math was also very bad at logical reasoning and understanding spatial tasks, again wondering if animal crackers, racism, educational incompetence and wicked parents are to blame here. Please correct me or add to my growing list of obvious impediments to all people being capable of doing graduate level algebraic topology
