>>11338864Yeah we should use nuclear I think
Also they're not hand in hand, just because two wildly different groups with different agendas reach the same conclusion, they have completely different reasons for doing so. So it's not "hand in hand"
>>11338891Yeah Germany shouldn't have done that, I don't think.
>>11338895Veganism is stupid because:
a) We need protein
b) We evolved to be omnivores, just like other primates (Chimpanzees eat meat, like small monkeys), and other mammals (like bears, pigs, etc.)
c) We need vitamin B12, which is only naturally found in meat, dairy, and eggs (supplements are stupid)
d) Other animals kill animals for food, so why shouldn't we?
e) Livestock only contribute a very small percentage of all greenhouse gas emissions. Pic related, from the EPA, only 9% of GHG emissions in the US are from agriculture. Source is here:
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions>>11338900Going back over the responses to you, if you've been the same guy all along, I think I got you confused with another guy who was annoyed at the map for not featuring a better scale or some shit, which is why I got angry
If you're criticising the map for not being complete, e.g. not accounting for the US's potential economic decline contributing to economic decline in Canada, then fair enough. I am not claiming the map in the OP is perfect. Sure I said Canada doesn't have a reason to reduce emissions, which I based upon the map. But yes, if your point is that the map is not a perfect projection, then I agree. Canada could actually suffer due to factors that the study didn't account for.
It's just a study I saw, which I thought was interesting.