>>11333788Are you high? It is ABSOLUTELY a proof technique. It's just that not all things can be proven using it. Mathematicians tend to not like it because although it can prove a statement to be true, it often doesn't give a lot of information as to WHY it's true. I'm tired of edgy retards who think just claiming a method to be flawed/bullshit without evidence or coherent argumentation is the same as actual debate/constructive criticism. Fuck off and read a book.
