>>11330663No it's an entirely cultural phenomenon. You have to understand that genetically distinct sexes are obviously real, but cultural genders are also obviously real. You have to look at the actual prevailing cultural standards of genders to understand what's going on.
Women are understood to be compassionate, loving, strong, capable, etc all the feminist bullshit. These are the prevailing cultural standards and expectations of women regardless of your personal views.
Men are understood to be stupid, violent, aggressive, hypersexual, muscular, hairy, etc, take your pick of the tv comedy dad or the rapper or pick up artists or whatever, it all congeals into a sort of confused but generally negative gender standard, which despite your personal views is the prevailing definition of the male gender.
Obviously, many men don't feel they're accurately represented by or identify with the current idea of the male gender. While they're obviously biologically male, culturally they are not men. In other times and other places, there's a well defined positive idea of the male gender with an obvious initiation into manhood, but we don't have any of that these days.
With the rising acceptance of transsexuality, a man who does not fit the cultural definition of a man (as confused and shitty as it is) is, if adhering to societal standards, not a man at all, and therefore must be a woman (or non binary or whatever other stupid buzzword).
This is why there are substantially more MtF transsexuals than FtM. This isn't an issue that effects women as much because their gender is well defined and generally positive.
