>>11331869>You have to look at a lot of literature, the underlying physiology, and synthesize this into a general picture of the way of things.That's why I asked for literature overviews. There are no doubt thousands of papers about the topic and it's even harder to sift through them because related-term papers included, they will surely number in the tens of thousands.
At least a few examples to start with should be helpful.
> it requires me to either include a wall of links with summariesNo, it requires 3 good papers and that's it. You have provided 0. At best 0.5 since despite the low sample count in that study, it's still not THAT low that I would discount it irrevocably, but I'd only accept it in light of other studies to basically add to the sample count.
>or write my own reviewYou're just trying to find excuses now.
> and a few papers demonstrate an effect lasting longer than 3 months.None of which you have provided.
> Many things are on the list.I went through every one of the papers you posted and found nothing to support your claim outright. In fact, some of the papers you posted directly contradicted your claim, suggesting you have not actually read any of the papers you posted here.
