>>11335046It's not just that. It's also really hard to grasp what the comic was even trying to say (ironically) beside "my opponents are clowns". Why would the character who's not a clown find "six million cookies" to be a funny edgy joke, while finding the ultimate infograph to mean the guy is a nazi? If anything it should be inversed, as one of them celebrates the "cooking" of jews (in ovens) and makes fun of it, while the other could be construed any which way.
Additionally, "six million cookies" was by definition a joke, so why is the clown acting like it wasn't a joke? Moreover, if the clown is in fact a nazi, why would he try to hide the fact he was serious about the "joke that's not a joke"? Moreover, a clown's role in life is to make jokes/say funny things. Why would the character not infer from context that the latter is a joke but the former is? What is unusual with the infographic as a response to the guy finding obvious nazi jokes funny? How would it not be another obvious source of entertainment for him?
Not only that, but in how it relates to the real world: when has a /pol/tard, for example, EVER disavowed a da jooz infographic or failed to glorify nazis? Why would what is meant as a representative of /pol/tards present the infographic with any other intent than "nazis are right umad?" kind of feeling? What is "underlying message" supposed to mean when infographics are a direct presentation of information with no intention to be subtle whatsoever?
