>>11325681Most of them are jokes because there are too few people overall to name a sufficiently large amount of women in specific as meaningful (because we have to therefore automatically eliminate all non-STEM disciplines which removes 99% of women graduates from the potential pool). It's a numbers' game and women are not winning it. It's a simple evolutionary consequence of women wanting to be mothers and carrying the kid for 9 months and such, most of them just don't have the drive to do both that and groundbreaking research.
We may name 100 phenomenal men, but that discounts their billions of contemporaries that we have never heard of and mostly didn't amount to anything.
