Is it just me, or does this guy's entire system revolve around IMMEDIATE COMMITMENT.
Let me ask you guys a question. Which one of you, when playing Poker, attempts to play the game with a given probability sets of moves that you would perform given a certain amount of chips and movements understood during that move no matter what (whatever were the behaviors of the other player's movements, be they erratic as they are or whatever your pretended knowledge of their cards might be based on assumptions). Did you come up with the solution that you could make a science out of this strategy?
Did you come up with the solution that you could make a science out of the strategy of choosing an end or a particular set of ends in the game of Chess before you even start? Is that even how chess works!?!
Everyone, I present to you, a complete bastardization and misinterpretation of John Von Neumann's Game Theory: Harsanyi's Rational Behavior...
Fuck this, I'm out
Let me ask you guys a question. Which one of you, when playing Poker, attempts to play the game with a given probability sets of moves that you would perform given a certain amount of chips and movements understood during that move no matter what (whatever were the behaviors of the other player's movements, be they erratic as they are or whatever your pretended knowledge of their cards might be based on assumptions). Did you come up with the solution that you could make a science out of this strategy?
Did you come up with the solution that you could make a science out of the strategy of choosing an end or a particular set of ends in the game of Chess before you even start? Is that even how chess works!?!
Everyone, I present to you, a complete bastardization and misinterpretation of John Von Neumann's Game Theory: Harsanyi's Rational Behavior...
Fuck this, I'm out
