/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11309271

27KiB, 400x400, 1550681998606.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

the chemistry of sperm

Anonymous Fri 17 Jan 21:05:04 2020 No.11309271 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11309978 >>11309996 >>11310316 >>11310327 >>11310372 >>11311521

How is it that the creation of sperm is not entirely quarantined? You'd think the body would do everything it can to prevent anything else in the body from affecting sperm?
How can diet effect the taste of sperm? I know for a fact that many females confirm that a diet rich in pineapple has a positive effect on the taste of sperm.
Can someone explain how that works and why?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 03:48:28 No.11309978 Report

Quoted By:

>>11309271
It's for the same reason that your sweat will smell like garlic if you eat a lot of it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 03:59:18 No.11309996 Report

Quoted By: >>11310012

>>11309271
>How is it that the creation of sperm is not entirely quarantined?
What, like in a mason jar?
Everything's all interconnected. How else is oxygen, bolod sugar, etc going to get to the testicles?
How would the sperm get out?
>You'd think the body would do everything it can to prevent anything else in the body from affecting sperm?
Everything about human testicles strikes me as a counter-argument against intelligent design.
But it makes more sense for the species than the individual.
If you don't stop eating habanero peppers and road kill, smoking meth and drinking your own pee, your little swimmers SHOULD stop working right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 04:05:02 No.11310012 Report

Quoted By: >>11310038

>>11309996
>What, like in a mason jar?
DURRRR
the body filters loads of things, it's one of the main functions of your body, so I'm asking why it's not more strict with what goes into jizz

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 04:18:34 No.11310038 Report

Quoted By: >>11310057 >>11310151 >>11310154

>>11310012
>so I'm asking why it's not more strict with what goes into jizz
And I answered you.
Any factors making you a poor candidate for reproduction should effect sperm production and viability.
Any population without this mechanism will not do as well as a population where the environment does affect sperm.
Don't forget: males are the disposable gender.
A single male can impregnate a LOT of females, and if they must compete for the right to reproduce, even in this way, it won't effect the number of offspirng.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 04:28:08 No.11310057 Report

Quoted By: >>11310132

>>11310038
>poor candidate
the taste of sperm has nothing to do with that
it's not supposed to be shot into her mouth
your fucking argument is retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 04:56:08 No.11310132 Report

Quoted By: >>11310151

>>11310057
>it's not supposed to be shot into her mouth
>your fucking argument is retarded

>it's not supposed to be shot into her mouth
If that were true then there would be no real harm in environmental factors affecting your sperm, now would there?

In reality, the taste/smell/look of your sperm is probably a factor in continuing to have sex with a given woman, both in terms of foreplay leading to round two, and in a day-to-day basis.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:01:36 No.11310151 Report

Quoted By:

>>11310132
>entirely quarantined?
p.s. You're also ignoring the part about:
>>11310038
>Any factors making you a poor candidate for reproduction should effect sperm production and viability.
>sperm production and viability.
When environmental factors affect your sperm, they aren't just changing the smell and taste.
The same factors you think should be filtered also affect their viability, swimming ability, possibility of piercing the ovum cell membrane etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:03:14 No.11310154 Report

Quoted By: >>11310161

p.s. You're also ignoring the part about:
>>11310038 (You)
>Any factors making you a poor candidate for reproduction should effect sperm production and viability.
>sperm production and viability.
When environmental factors affect your sperm, they aren't just changing the smell and taste.
The same factors you think should be filtered also affect their viability, swimming ability, possibility of piercing the ovum cell membrane etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:05:46 No.11310161 Report

Quoted By: >>11310171

>>11310154
that goes against evolution you mongoloid
your body will not fight against carrying on your genetics. you clearly don't know shit

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO explaining.jpg, 138KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:11:59 No.11310171 Report

Quoted By: >>11310176 >>11310186 >>11311631

>>11310161
>that goes against evolution you mongoloid
If I'm wrong, then why DO environmental factors affect sperm?

>>11310161
>your body will not fight against carrying on your genetics
Sure it will, and should.
Evolution isn't about whats good for every individual's own personal genes.
It's all about what's good for the _species_.
Environmental factors DO affect sperm so that less suitable fathers have a smaller chance of passing on their shitty genes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:14:03 No.11310176 Report

Quoted By:

p.s., see also:
>>11310171
>Any population without this mechanism will not do as well as a population where the environment does affect sperm.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:19:36 No.11310186 Report

Quoted By: >>11310199

>>11310171
>If I'm wrong
you are wrong, you just made a stupid baseless comment that goes against the core principles of evolution.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO bewbs4.png, 80KiB, 306x442

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:27:42 No.11310199 Report

Quoted By: >>11310240 >>11310261

>>11310186
>you are wrong, you just made a stupid baseless comment that goes against the core principles of evolution.
. >>>---> OR... <---<<<
Maybe you're wrong.
Ask yourself, which argument fits the facts?
You're still 100% certain that a pineapple diet _shouldn't_ affect your sperm, even though I'm offering a perfectly plausible explanation.
Meanwhile, your only counter-arguments are:
>it's not supposed to be shot into her mouth
>your fucking argument is retarded
> you clearly don't know shit
>stupid baseless comment
..and your insistence that _your_ understanding of evolution is better than mine, even though it can't explain the observed data that _you_ brought to the thread.
That's the opposite of how science is supposed to work.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

Posting tits in the hope someone else will join the thread. You're starting to bore me.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO amandalepore.jpg, 60KiB, 409x600

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:50:52 No.11310240 Report

Quoted By:

>>11310199
More tits.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 05:59:48 No.11310261 Report

Quoted By: >>11310284

>>11310199
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Not a real thing. Read Feyerabend.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO B76E916.jpg, 496KiB, 1083x1600

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 06:13:40 No.11310284 Report

Quoted By:

>>11310261
>Scientific_method
>Not a real thing.

Wow.
Just wow.
& more tits.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 06:29:35 No.11310316 Report

Quoted By: >>11311087

>>11309271
Whoa it's almost as if you're not supposed to drink cum.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 06:36:21 No.11310327 Report

Quoted By: >>11311105

>>11309271
semen=/=sperm

El Arcón

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO TIMESAND___action.png, 208KiB, 678x762

El Arcón Sat 18 Jan 2020 06:56:53 No.11310372 Report

Quoted By:

>>11309271
Ricky's dad looks like the children of his tribe are about to move into the junk heap with him.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 09:14:52 No.11310527 Report

Quoted By: >>11311087

It sort of is. Immune privilege is a thing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 09:29:52 No.11310546 Report

Quoted By: >>11311087

>chemistry of living thing
probably carbon and water.
t. biochemist

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO huge.jpg, 30KiB, 400x492

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 15:18:09 No.11311087 Report

Quoted By: >>11311105

>>11310527
>>11310546
Not sure what either of these posts mean.
Not sure where OP went.
Still waiting to hear any actual argument about sperm and evolution.

>>11310316
>you're not supposed to drink cum.
>not supposed to

>implying humans were created on purpose, and with particular intent
Let me know when you find the user's manual for the human race. Then we can check to see if you're right.

also: more tits (not sure why this thread isn't more popular)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 15:27:35 No.11311105 Report

Quoted By: >>11311130 >>11311631

>>11310327
Get thee gone from this place medifag

>>11311087
Your core assumption seems to be essentially that evolution produces the best possible thing, but it doesn't; it produces the thing that is less bad than the other things.
There's a ton of "bad" "designs" or "features" or whatever with human (and various animal) anatomy. Whether you want to talk about our retarded feet, our retarded death from child birth complications, or shit like male bedbugs literally injecting their genetic material into the bloodstream of females thereby wounding them and (when a bunch do it to the same female) killing that female (also some males get killed by other males accidentally trying to impregnate a male)

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ttis.jpg, 32KiB, 570x684

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 15:39:20 No.11311130 Report

Quoted By:

>>11311105
>Your core assumption seems to be essentially that evolution produces the best possible thing,
I think you're fighting a straw man here.
My core argument is that evolution favors what's good for the species, not (as op argues) what's good for a given individual.
I'm not saying anything about "best possible", I'm just suggesting less suitable fathers are less likely to reproduce, in this case because environmental factors _do_ affect sperm, which addresses OP's original question.

also, more tits

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 18:08:45 No.11311521 Report

Quoted By:

>>11309271

Semen is not quarantined. Sperm creation is like • + () = ( • ) —> ( • )))—>
( • )~~~~~~. I don’t think sperm is living. Since the germ is buoyant in fluid. Simple appearance. And the motion is highly reactive to the chemicals in semen. So it’s like a wooden snake with segments holding it together for flexibility. You can make it do moves by water movement even do flips. Pineapple has enzymes that break down protein and aid in digestion. Sperm is not what is important however but the germ. Main germ just restamps itself all over again.

Are you implying eggs are at greater security to carry and handle than germs? Since quantity of eggs are made and germs restamped everyday?

If that’s the case men should stay home and females work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 18:52:53 No.11311631 Report

Quoted By:

>>11310171
>Evolution isn't about whats good for every individual's own personal genes.
Not necessarily. It's really about lengthening and broadening an individuals lineage, the population benefits comes a bit later. (one exception is environmental effects which affects the population first)
>>11311105
By what metric do you determine "good" or "bad" features? If it "just werks" then by evolutionary standards it's perfect.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches