>>11309982I'm not the one who said "dreams are also apparently how we encode long term memories", I just pointed out that your response to that wasn't an argument, and it still isn't an argument.
If you want to concede the argument then that's cool, I have no problems with that.
>>113100131) I'm not the person who made the post claiming about long term memories
2) If someone ACTUALLY disputed that assertion then the thing to say is "sounds like bollocks, what's your source". Just saying that it "makes no sense" means you're a mental five year old. You couldn't even formulate the relevant interrogative question. You were just thick.
Speak like a five year old, get treated like a five year old. You can keep crying about it if you want but you get what you give.
