>>11306367It's just like what happened in """philosophy""" with hacks like Roland Barthes, it became like poetry, saying something simple with fancy words, the goal being to obscure how simple it is. To me reading about maths goes like this:
>I understand fucking nothing holy shit>if I focus I can figure it out maybe>finally I figure it out>also figure it that it's simple and the authors are retards doing dumb shit but trying to sound smartlike the fucking Remez algorithm holy shit I've already made a faster and more robust minmax algorithm using the integral of the magnitude of the analytic function as a displacement map to tweak the difference function without even trying.
I want to say that videos will kill the paper, but currently YT videos about maths are extremely shitty, usually it's a professor reading a power point or writing stuff with zero editing, proper visualisations and with incomprehensible jokes inserted.
>>11306390I tried reading Gauss's ~1805 paper explaining his fast Fourier transform algorithm, and despite being written in neo-Latin it's still more readable and simple than most of the stuff on arxiv.
