>>11304807>>11304810Yeah, I don't buy it. Conflicts completely with my experience. Though my generation was irradiated with microwaves from a young age, I think it started late enough that it didn't significantly alter musculoskeletal structure. The most consistently intelligent women seem to have a thinner physique, and have a waist hip of ~0.7. Hard to find the right word, it's not small or thin, but there's a certain body type.
Essentially as a man you're largely selecting for mitochondrial quality and ability to feed the developing fetus adequately. You want women who are energetic, long lived, and durable. For example my maternal line routinely lives into their hundreds, faculties fully intact, negligible cancer rate, rapid healing, remain appearing young into their 60's. My mother is 60 and goes out and hauls wood in, shovels, pulls all nighters as needed, etc. She's 5'5 and probably like 120 lbs.
It's a shame my mitochondrial DNA dies with me. I'm sure it's not completely gone, but traced back quite a ways there's no unbroken maternal line. Anyway, to afford your offspring great advantage, mitochondrial quality is the key. I've not encountered particular intelligence in women with more tendency to put on bulk. That's a distinct warm climate breeder strategy, where it's more about population average.