/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11300480

25KiB, 388x280, 1563845769369.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

The Future & Space

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 03:41:58 2020 No.11300480 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11300491 >>11301142 >>11301189 >>11301452

This was made in the 50's as their vision for the future (of space).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXIDFx74aSY

With your knowledge of today and current/upcoming tech, how do you guess the future of technology and space exploration works and visually looks like?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:45:10 No.11300485 Report

Quoted By: >>11300492 >>11300513 >>11301133 >>11301666

space isn't that exciting. why does /sci/ never talk about anything interesting? it's space, iq, and memes. i hate it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:47:19 No.11300491 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300480
It's hard to say specifically, but I guess that there will be a strong focus on refining reusable rockets to bring down the cost to go to space as that's a huge limiting factor. Expect more Starship-like rockets. Space industry will most likely focus on water ISRU as that's the easiest to obtain. The rest? IDK. That's alot of unkowns.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:47:36 No.11300492 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300485
I'm asking about future tech and science that could allow for space exploration. you not caring about exploring space is irrelevant to this thread.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:48:28 No.11300493 Report

Quoted By:

space flight general space flight general space flight general

it's so gay and it never fucking ends. there are hundreds of topics in science that are far more interesting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:49:37 No.11300495 Report

Quoted By: >>11300508 >>11301130 >>11301133

nobody irl wants to do anything fun, and everyone on the internet is a shill. it's goddamned depressing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:51:11 No.11300500 Report

Quoted By: >>11300504

I just want to know how to visually design plausible future space ships. What kind of tech would they use that would dictate the visual design?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:52:24 No.11300504 Report

Quoted By: >>11300507

>>11300500
>I just want to know how to visually design plausible future space ships.
This website will be your friend. http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/

>What kind of tech would they use that would dictate the visual design?
Very much dependent on how far into the future you're looking into, and what mission is the spacecraft expected to complete.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:53:39 No.11300507 Report

Quoted By: >>11300521

>>11300504
>Very much dependent on how far into the future you're looking into, and what mission is the spacecraft expected to complete.
not so far in the future that the design would be unrecognizable. More like Mars and Moon base building era and perhaps whatever comes after.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Saturn_rings.jpg, 21KiB, 1020x1020

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:53:43 No.11300508 Report

Quoted By: >>11300511

>>11300495
Don't worry. One day mankind will return to space, leaving the nay-sayers behind as they kicked and screamed.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1575370577929.jpg, 2MiB, 2500x1407

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:56:29 No.11300510 Report

Quoted By: >>11301148

>IXS
how would these rings work? and what would the next generation of something like this look like?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:56:33 No.11300511 Report

Quoted By: >>11300524 >>11301133

>>11300508

naysayer? you're the dicks posting the same goddamned threads every day. and they're not even that interesting

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:57:14 No.11300513 Report

Quoted By: >>11300520

>>11300485
Post something interesting then.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:57:53 No.11300515 Report

Quoted By: >>11300526

/sci/ loves to deride pop-sci but it's the epitome of vapid pop-sci itself.

and i normally think pop-sci is great but this is just dreck.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:59:16 No.11300520 Report

Quoted By: >>11300522 >>11300534

>>11300513

i do. all the time. i don't get much conversation though aside from a few jeers.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO spaceTug4.jpg, 464KiB, 808x1024

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:59:26 No.11300521 Report

Quoted By: >>11300523

>>11300507
Moon-Earth transport craft would probably look something like this if nuclear rockets in low Earth orbit were allowed.

http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/realdesigns4.php#nuclearshuttle

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 03:59:58 No.11300522 Report

Quoted By: >>11300528

>>11300520
>>i do. all the time
right now you're just turning /sci/ into your own whining crying blog

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:01:08 No.11300523 Report

Quoted By: >>11300533

>>11300521
based anon.
Do you have other sources or maybe pic collections you can share?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ISS_ Expedition49.jpg, 382KiB, 1920x1277

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:01:38 No.11300524 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300511
>you're the dicks posting the same goddamned threads every day.
Because spaceflight is cool.

>and they're not even that interesting
What's interesting is different for different people.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO z9f8v.gif, 2MiB, 480x480

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:01:51 No.11300525 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:02:10 No.11300526 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300515
lolwut. did you just say Wernher von Braun is the epitome of vapid pop-sci?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:02:40 No.11300528 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300522

sometimes you just have to say what's on your mind

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:05:58 No.11300533 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300523
>Do you have other sources
Astronautix (also known as Encyclopedia Astronautica) has some good stuff if you can tough it through how ugly the site looks.

Here's an example: http://astronautix.com/d/dlblunarbase.html

>or maybe pic collections you can share?
https://images.nasa.gov/ has some cool images for random browsing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:06:01 No.11300534 Report

Quoted By: >>11300545

>>11300520
Let's hear some interesting ideas.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:12:13 No.11300545 Report

Quoted By: >>11300550 >>11300580 >>11300865

>>11300534

how about lifting the ban on "homework questions"? you might get actual people talking here if they can discuss exercises and questions.

as far as discussion topics, i think cognitive psychology and psychological conditioning are interesting, and we don't hear a lot about them here. yeah, yeah "hurr durr not science". i think you can afford to broaden your definition just slightly since most threads here are bullshit anyway.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:14:05 No.11300550 Report

Quoted By: >>11300865

>>11300545
>i think cognitive psychology and psychological conditioning are interesting

or just human behavior in general. literally anything but another space flight general would be fresh.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:16:18 No.11300557 Report

Quoted By:

what about that libgen discussion not too long ago? what happened to that? the ethics and consequences of "piracy". that was fun.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:28:40 No.11300580 Report

Quoted By: >>11300586 >>11300865

>>11300545
All these rules are too strict (literal) nowadays but it's not like mods or anyone else care. It's like jannies and mods themselves hate 4chan more than anyone but I digress.
I think what killed 4chan was this witchhunt on "ironic shitposting," stifling all creativity and leaving behind only the most generic, bland and inoffensive posts and there is nothing more bland than talking about the futile goal of colonizing space.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:30:05 No.11300583 Report

Quoted By:

How can we colonize space when we can't even colonize this very planet? Fuck you.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Shelby_pointing.jpg, 56KiB, 1100x550

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 04:30:39 No.11300586 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300580
>stifling all creativity and leaving behind only the most generic, bland and inoffensive posts
Have you missed the Alabamian miracle that is Shelby posting?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 09:00:50 No.11300865 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300545
>>11300550
>>11300580

>t. doesn't know how to check the catalog

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 09:09:18 No.11300872 Report

Quoted By:

>tfw could have had glorious Von Braun 2020 with gigachad rockets and space lebensraum
>instead we got half a century of do literally nothing mic welfare parasites and all our future space hopes now rest on a hyper autistic weeaboo

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 09:34:01 No.11300899 Report

Quoted By: >>11300900

mo money for dem programs

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO JWST+Science+Planning+Timeline.jpg, 81KiB, 1024x768

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 09:34:53 No.11300900 Report

Quoted By: >>11300901

>>11300899

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 09:36:29 No.11300901 Report

Quoted By: >>11301143

>>11300900
What's the chance some newcomers have already retired while working entirely on that program?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO spam bots attack.png, 25KiB, 641x218

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 12:49:33 No.11301130 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300495
Most of 4chan/nel is populated with bot posting. The faster the board the more bot posting there is on it. Real posting is down to something like 2% of combined posts.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Not Like.jpg, 165KiB, 1800x1578

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 12:50:41 No.11301133 Report

Quoted By: >>11301157

>>11300485
>>11300495
>>11300511

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 12:57:41 No.11301142 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300480
>how do you guess the future of technology and space exploration works and visually looks like?
It will look much like today. In fact, due to the internet and instantly accessed world culture, all culture, fads, and related things are now starting to merge and stagnate. As a result, less technological progress is needed. All consumer product designs can be recycled as "new & innovative!" several times a generation now.

As for space exploration. It won't move forward very much. We may land people on Mars or where ever, but it simply won't matter at all. Just like landing on the moon didn't matter. Turns out that it is just popsci garbage & grant farming in the end.

Why? Because, no one wants to spend the cash to do something real.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 12:58:43 No.11301143 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300901
Most people on 4chan/4channel are younger than that program.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 13:02:56 No.11301148 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300510
>how would these rings work
The purely theoretical and (hopefully not for long) practically impossible Alcubierre drive
>what would the next gen look like
Presumably thinner/smaller rings with a larger body as the ship gets bigger and the drives tech becomes more compact

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 13:08:18 No.11301157 Report

Quoted By:

>>11301133
lolcheck'd

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1575011613916.jpg, 27KiB, 394x407

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 13:32:22 No.11301189 Report

Quoted By: >>11301192 >>11301310

>>11300480
anon this will prolly get buried or labeled pseudoscience and I know the only reason there aren't endless threads on /sci/ about this is because it's full of academy bots who reject anything fun in favor of incremental progress and academic stagnation but there is a Dr. Cesar Salvatore Pais working under the US Navy Aerospace program who claims and has patented a series of sci-fi like patents.
>room temperature super conductors
>Nuclear fusion reactor
>gravitational wave generator
>Electro Magnetic Field propulsion
>inb4 nuclear fusion >>>>>>/x/
No I can't be asked to download the source if you can't be asked to Google all of the above.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 13:33:56 No.11301192 Report

Quoted By:

>>11301189
Also the US Navy Technological Director or some similar title gave the "operable" on these patents. Meaning not just that they could work but that they will work. I'm paraphrasing a lot right now but anons with any soul left will give me the benefit of the doubt.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:03:04 No.11301310 Report

Quoted By:

>>11301189
based, thanks anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:16:11 No.11301338 Report

Quoted By: >>11301353 >>11301360

Daily reminded that this thread was posted multiple times in the past months and this same thread is still active on /g/.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:21:13 No.11301353 Report

Quoted By: >>11301360 >>11301388

>>11301338
no it wasn't you mong, I posted this here and it's the first time I have

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:25:22 No.11301360 Report

Quoted By: >>11301375 >>11301386

>>11301338
>this same thread is still active on /g/.
Not finding it there. Link?

>>11301353
I've seen this same thread posted many times on here. That's with the video and nearly the same image with same general subject. For many years now there's been inane repetition of threads in order to degrade board quality.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:31:23 No.11301375 Report

Quoted By: >>11301403

>>11301360
>I've seen this same thread posted many times on here.
sure you have, schizoid

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:34:37 No.11301386 Report

Quoted By: >>11301392 >>11301403

>>11301360
>Link
Pardon me last it was last night but correct non the less

>>>/g/74375266

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:35:40 No.11301388 Report

Quoted By:

>>11301353
That psy ops shit doesnt work on me pal.
lurking this hell hole for 10 years

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:36:49 No.11301392 Report

Quoted By: >>11301403

>>11301386
>many times on here
>once on /g/
retard. I posted that there where the autistic spergs here started whining about space being too fun for them to talk about. now go fuck yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:40:13 No.11301403 Report

Quoted By: >>11301425

>>11301375
Not the exact same thread, but several variations of it. Seems you are out of luck: >>>/g/74375266

>>11301386
Thanks.

>>11301392
>backpedaling

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 15:47:09 No.11301425 Report

Quoted By:

>>11301403
>backpedaling
the /g/ thread was made AFTER this one you mongoloid retard
no one else has made my thread here before.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1453405927423.jpg, 42KiB, 460x500

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 16:04:26 No.11301452 Report

Quoted By:

>>11300480
*yawn* At least it isn't guerilla question threads.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1576582661181.jpg, 296KiB, 2560x1440

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 18:20:12 No.11301630 Report

Quoted By:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xlmdtf3UbmQ
this is the type of stuff I'm after
anyone have more?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO water.jpg, 3MiB, 3611x2400

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 18:42:04 No.11301666 Report

Quoted By: >>11301670

>>11300485
>space isn't that exciting

doing
>pic related
and concluding that the ocean isn't that exciting

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Jan 2020 18:42:53 No.11301670 Report

Quoted By:

>>11301666
based satan

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches