>>11304432Wishful thinking, kiddo.
I've come to call this recent tendency the "complete mind fallacy", along with a similar but distinct trend, the "born yesterday fallacy".
The complete mind fallacy is the assumption that a speaker, or writer, has communicated the entirety of their mind in their statement. Every piece of information, any doubts, error control, matters considered along the way, all contained in what they've stated explicitly. This indicates a near obliteration of theory of mind, you're quite literally too lazy and dimwitted to see the person behind the work. You think because something isn't explicitly addressed, it isn't considered nor is it part of their mind. Because of this you make stupid claims and statements instead of having conversations or asking questions. Subhuman behavior.
The born yesterday fallacy can be concisely summed as the above, with the additional assumption that there are types that are pretty much off the assembly line. There is notion of a process, or genesis, of the individual.
I wanted to make it clear that you're a moron and an asshole, and lucky you're getting anything, before proceeding. As far as electromagnetic weapons goes, there really wasn't much in the way of shell games between the US and USSR. It was suspected by many at the time that they were trying to spook us, sow discomfort in the citizenry, and to cripple our military and industrial capability. The USSR had the first safety standard for RF exposure in the general population, and it was 1000x lower than what was believed to be safe in the west. So there were considerations of whether this was also a front they paid lip service to, while imposing only selective military and industrial restrictions. Now that it's 50 years later, we know this was largely false. The sheer mass of research produced in the USSR reflected genuine interest, and their findings were replicated at the time, and have now been replicated quite generally internationally.
