>>11298014The logic for answer C is the following:
Add column 1 to column 2, so the first row will have the bottom right dot missing. To reach the answer of column 3, you must delete dots that have a diagonally adjacent dot, leaving the dots that do not have a diagonally adjacent dot.
In the 3rd row, there are no dots in column 1, therefore the the 2 dots do not have any diagonally adjacent dots, so they stay. This also works if you flip it and do it vertically as well. Answer C.
Logic to answer D is
>>11298034I'm more inclined to chose answer C because it works in both dimensions whereas D only works in 1.
The trick is to apply boolean logic and build rules that work.
t. 138IQ child of a parent who is part of a massive medical study (all children born in a city during a specific year are studied by the local university from birth to death, their children can optionally partake and are opted in as children, whom can choose to either opt in or out at age 15, with monetary reimbursments for your time) who got IQ tested at 15
