>>11301969>>I’ve already addressed this>Read my post, I refuted itctrl-f "megastructures", 11 instances found, not one refutation by you.
>>11301969>>We can't detect "weird objects" (or any objects) >We could if they had interstellar fucking propulsionPlease explain all possible forms of interstellar propulsion (possibly including all possible forms of FTL) and we can go over which would be detectable to current human technology.
>>11301969>Radio transmissions aren’t the only kind of transmissions that exist, brainlet.OK, what forms of hypothetical, non-electromagnetic spectrum broadcasts are we supposedly looking for? Help me out, I'm apparently a brainlet. :^)
>Anything, anywhere. I never said crashed starship, you need to learn to read.You said ", any sort of debris or defunct tech that is clearly artificial, evidence of Von Neumann probes," anything like that on Earth, having come from an interstellar source would have to come (duh) from an interstellar vessel.
So OK, you're complaining not just about "where all the crashed spaceships at?", instead you're suggesting we should have found some kind of interstellar souvenirs left over from non-crashed space ships? My bad bro. ;^)
>I never typed that. Learn to read,Oops, mis-placed angle bracket. My whole argument is invalid now. You win, oh noooes!
:^0
>Because vast interstellar empires aren’t a covert thing.STILL waiting to hear how/why we'd notice them.
Any such tech is completely unknown to us, but you're 100% certain we can detect it, even though we're just starting to notice "nearby" planets?
> I have now proven that Cthulhu exists.You seem confused. I've always claimed we can't rule out interstellar neighbors. YOU'RE the one drawing conclusions, while I'm just saying we aren't equipped to say anything for sure.
