/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11292809

974KiB, 1170x2048, EqYmU6p.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 02:01:15 2020 No.11292809 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11292851 >>11292857 >>11292869

Does this lend credibility to the incel hypothesis that claims many women would fuck their dogs?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO .22.gif, 76KiB, 400x200

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:01:41 No.11292812 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO speechless.png, 28KiB, 583x625

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:03:17 No.11292815 Report

Quoted By: >>11292826

>tfw I participated in the study they're talking about for like $20
>mfw when reading this

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:08:03 No.11292826 Report

Quoted By: >>11292839

>>11292815
did they show you any traps?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:14:03 No.11292839 Report

Quoted By: >>11292846

>>11292826
>did they show you any traps?
No traps, only cispeople. Just had to wear some sterilized cock ring (penile gauge) in a dimly lit room while they cycled through lo-res nude pics on a big TV. There was a tissue box next to the chair you're in in case you somehow blew your load

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:16:23 No.11292846 Report

Quoted By: >>11292859

>>11292839
was the top researcher a jew?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:20:03 No.11292851 Report

Quoted By:

>>11292809
>would

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 6yyvc4ye01a01.png, 850KiB, 1124x1130

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:24:21 No.11292857 Report

Quoted By:

>>11292809
incels are actually more right about women than any other group. they are just mocked and derided because they are incels.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Capture.jpg, 28KiB, 296x513

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:25:27 No.11292859 Report

Quoted By: >>11292879

>>11292846
>was the top researcher a jew?
Possibly, but I don't think so

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:31:43 No.11292869 Report

Quoted By: >>11292882

>>11292809
no it's a reflex to prevent infections from rape, it cues up in response to any sexual activity regardless of psychological arousal

>The nature of female sexual response may also play a rolein producing low concordance among women. […] Reflexive vaginal responding may have been beneficial because vaginal vasocongestion results in lubrication of the genital tract, reducing the likelihood of injury and subsequent infection resulting from vaginal penetration. Ancestral women who did not reflexively lubricate and who experienced unwanted sex would have been more likely to experience injuries or infections that could have rendered them reproductively sterile or resulted in their deaths after sustaining injury during genital penetration. Thus, there might have been selective pressure ongenital automaticity to any cues of sexual activities. Discordance may, therefore, be the result of low subjective arousal despite reflexive genital response to a sexual stimulus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:37:07 No.11292879 Report

Quoted By:

>>11292859
Moaaar pls she's so HOT!!!
>mommy gf
>10/10
fapfapfapfapfapfapploft
Think I'd use the tissues while she instructed me.
Would that count?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:40:24 No.11292882 Report

Quoted By: >>11292895

>>11292869
So women have this "fluid sexuality" because they were raped so much in ancient society, wow.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:56:37 No.11292895 Report

Quoted By:

>>11292882
That's hot AND they deserved it

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches