>>11293553>You have reddit-tier reasoning>gets his arguments from /r/anarchocapitalismOnce you get to university take some good philosophy classes to teach you how to think.
When the incentive is profit, as history has proven, you get mass dishonesty and manipulation.
>So that isn't a fault, since what you are suggesting should exist, already does exist, it would have not made a difference if the workers didn't speak up in the first place.That's not what he's suggesting. He's suggesting absolute worker control in which workers are held accountable directly by other workers. Even the most flawed socialist experiments like the USSR didn't have problems like this post industrialization.
>if the goal is profitsAre you implying it isn't? What do you think the goal is?
>then having your airplanes be faulty and cause accidents isn't profitable you retardYou're right. Producing them to a point where they are barely functional is, however, as every company on earth does. Corners are cut where possible. Boeing is one of the very rare companies which has gone too far, as VW was one of the very rare companies to get caught in huge fraud and actually get hurt. There's a reason Amazon isn't paying taxes and shitty business practices have existed for as long as capitalism has without the market stopping them. You're an idealistic child, and it's clear where you came from, newfag.
>If anything Capitalism would spur competition for a safer alternative, which is currently occuring as we speak. In your vacuum, sure. In reality, not at all. Competition leads to certain syntheses of contradictions within the economy, an example of this being competitors settling for equally shitty practices, organizing mutually beneficial arrangements, etc.
You simply don't know what you're talking about.
