I am in need of people who I can talk to about statistics and psychology and I figure this is the go-to board.

So, I took the RAADS-R autism test because I'm supposedly asperger but I do not recognize my official diagnosis

I noticed two strange things:
1) I pass the test positive but I'm more along "neurotypical" scores AND
2) said neurotypicals (non autistic person/ bar the 'no autism' at the beginning of the test) also fall above threshold value!
like wtf

either a more than 200.000 samples experiment is a big EBIN :DDD

or am I understanding something wrong?

looking at the graph (copying form my original post on /adv/)

>the graphic and data outline a 4th peak

>there's neurotypical peak below 65 threshold value and that's fine Chad and Stacy sit here as expected
>there's aspies and suspected aspies at up the wazoo
>and then there is this fourth peak near ninety

from my knowledge of statistics -physicist here- a bell curve like the yellow one has some kind of systematic error, like if there was a 4th curve lying underneath, centered around 90

Also how the heck did they made the yellow curve's top stay at around 45 if the raw data says average is 80?
Is the automatic graph generator shot or am I missing something 2deep4u?

Is it yet another form of autism that sits between normal and and autistic?