>>11290807Nothing metaphysical is verifiable.
Moreover, simply because something cannot be verified, does not mean that it cannot be true.
Imagine if everyone in the world ceased to exist.
Would our universe continue to exist?
We already know of matter which doesn't interact with light (dark matter), so why should there not exist any kind of "matter" which doesn't interact with anything we know?
Why couldn't there be laws which govern the exotic matter which do not apply to our own?
Imagine if there were a sapient being which exists in a world made entirely of this type of matter.
They could truthfully say that the part of the universe which we are familiar with cannot be verified, and that there is no reason to believe that it exists.
This is a perfectly valid opinion, but this does not change the truth of our own existence.
There is also no reason to assume that everything that exists can be detected or interact with what we know.
Science describes only what can be verified, and gives a description only of the universe that can be detected.
This makes it a very useful tool, but it cannot be used to describe the totality of the universe, nor can it be used to rule out the existence of anything outside of what we are familiar with.